I have noticed that a script that worked with a version that was current
in March 2015 (14.2.13_2015.03.23) does not work with the latest two (or
more) versions.
Briefly, I have a short DNA fragment in a png file that loads with the
following commands:
load DNAH-2.png;
set showHydrogens
On 01/20/2016 07:37 PM, Pshemak Maslak wrote:
> I have noticed that a script that worked with a version that was current
> in March 2015 (14.2.13_2015.03.23) does not work with the latest two (or
> more) versions.
>
> Briefly, I have a short DNA fragment in a png file that loads with the
>
Thanks Rolf. That helps.
PM
On 1/20/2016 2:51 PM, Rolf Huehne wrote:
> On 01/20/2016 07:37 PM, Pshemak Maslak wrote:
>> I have noticed that a script that worked with a version that was current
>> in March 2015 (14.2.13_2015.03.23) does not work with the latest two (or
>> more) versions.
>>
>>
jQuery to the rescue.
$('[id$="_appletdiv"]').length
--
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web
That sounds right. We get our DSSR analysis from Columbia University, and
that format did recently change. It was a beta version previously; it
should be stable now. Sorry for the trouble.
Bob
--
Site24x7 APM Insight:
Hi all
I need to find out the numer of Jmol objects existing so far in a page.
I was expecting this to work
alert( Jmol._applets.length )
However, it returns 'undefined'. I can see that Jmol._applets does exist as a
Javascript object. Some posts in the users list say it is an array of
Well, it does not work. "i" is higher than the nr of Jmol objects
> BTW, this works though it's unnecessary convoluted in my opinion
> var i=0;
> for (j in Jmol._applets) { i++; }
> alert(i)
i comes out as 0, 3, 5, 7 ...
That's because each item in Jmol._applets is kind of
Yes, that's pretty much what you have to do. It's not an array; it's an
object. Jmol._applets will contain 2n or 2n+1 entries, where n is the
number of applets. The "or 2n+1" comes from the fact that I say because I
recently fixed a bug that introduced a useless single key/value pair that
ended up
OK,
Thanks Bob
I understand there are functional reasons behind that construction.
I still think this needs a rather convoluted method for something that is
conceptually simple: how many Jmol objects in a page.
And I am not too happy hard-coding this to using internal variables and
9 matches
Mail list logo
