Then mmCIF is perfect for you. Just create one loop like I showed, along
with those two necessary header lines. Done.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Rolf Huehne wrote:
> On 01/29/2015 10:21 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> > My point was that you can easily create a CIF with Perl or anything else
>
On 01/29/2015 10:21 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> My point was that you can easily create a CIF with Perl or anything else
> that Jmol will parse *for the information in the ATOM/HETATM/CONECT lines*,
> which is what it sounded like you were saying. You did not refer to
> specific REMARK records. Some
My point was that you can easily create a CIF with Perl or anything else
that Jmol will parse *for the information in the ATOM/HETATM/CONECT lines*,
which is what it sounded like you were saying. You did not refer to
specific REMARK records. Some of those are more involved.
Basically you just add
On 01/29/2015 06:21 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> I guess it must have to do with what you mean by "etc"?? Maybe I did not
> understand your original question:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Hi all, I am looking for a replacement for the PDB format that offers the
> same options like predefined atom numbers, atom
I guess it must have to do with what you mean by "etc"?? Maybe I did not
understand your original question:
*Hi all, I am looking for a replacement for the PDB format that offers the
same options like predefined atom numbers, atom names, residue names etc.
after loading into Jmol. But witho
On 01/28/2015 08:23 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> In terms of parsers for *all *the information in an mmCIF file, there are
> several out there. I happen to think Jmol's is the best. It's
> Java/JavaScript; there are C++ versions as well. Basically, when you load
> JSmol, you have a complete CIF pars
I still don't understand your point, Rolf. mmCIF provides a very simple
format -- about as simple as XYZ format, as you can see there in what I
sent. You can design it just about any way you like; it's extremely easy to
parse with a program and easy to read as a human. Why the griping? XML
requires
On 01/28/2015 06:58 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> I think if you believe mMCIF is "horrible" then you should look again. You
> can
> basically put a standard PDB file straight into it with a simple header
> that identifies
> the fields. What could be easier than that? -- Same data used twice, though
>
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Rolf Huehne
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking for a replacement for the PDB format that offers the same
> options like predefined atom numbers, atom names, residue names etc.
> after loading into Jmol. But without the restrictions of the PDB format
> regarding at
Hi all,
I am looking for a replacement for the PDB format that offers the same
options like predefined atom numbers, atom names, residue names etc.
after loading into Jmol. But without the restrictions of the PDB format
regarding atom count and residue number count.
Q: Is there anything other
10 matches
Mail list logo
