Re: [josm-dev] New GPX implementation

2009-05-06 Thread Ľubomír Varga
It will run everywhere. Only "problem" with portability is that, that on java 1.5 systems is some aditional lib (packable into josm.jar) needed. afaik. But I see it like handicap, because if Iam not wrong, that lib has about 7 MB. That is realy big think to bundle with josm. I hope Iam wrong...

Re: [josm-dev] New GPX implementation

2009-05-06 Thread Greg Troxel
1.6 isn't available for PowerPC Macs, FWIW. Apple haven't made a PPC Mac since 2006. I still use PPC for both my main machines (but then I'm not a JOSM user so that may be moot). This is in my view a sufficient reason to insist that everything work with 1.5. But, if someone just has to dow

Re: [josm-dev] New GPX implementation

2009-05-06 Thread Petr Nejedlý
Greg Troxel napsal(a): > But, if someone just has to download a jar and add it to a command line, > that doesn't seem like a big deal, even if it is 7 MB. > It _is_ a big deal in case the change brings no benefit to most of the users. And I would even expect that it would make performance and m

Re: [josm-dev] New GPX implementation

2009-05-06 Thread Greg Troxel
Petr Nejedlý writes: > Greg Troxel napsal(a): >> But, if someone just has to download a jar and add it to a command line, >> that doesn't seem like a big deal, even if it is 7 MB. >> > It _is_ a big deal in case the change brings no benefit to most of the > users. > And I would even expect th

Re: [josm-dev] New GPX implementation

2009-05-06 Thread Henrik Niehaus
Ľubomír Varga schrieb: > It will run everywhere. Only "problem" with portability is that, that on java > 1.5 systems is some aditional lib (packable into josm.jar) needed. afaik. But > I see it like handicap, because if Iam not wrong, that lib has about 7 MB. It's only 1 MB and can be packaged

Re: [josm-dev] New GPX implementation

2009-05-06 Thread Henrik Niehaus
Frederik Ramm schrieb: > Hi, > > Henrik Niehaus wrote: >> At the moment JOSM puts most of the GPX elements into a map like >> (tag_name, value). If the user decides to write the file back to disk >> the order of the elements is random. So there is a good chance that you >> get an invalid file. >

Re: [josm-dev] New GPX implementation

2009-05-06 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Henrik Niehaus wrote: > The use case of supporting the "GPX standard" is equal to the use case > of supporting GPX, in my opinion. Do it right or leave it be. I was asking because it seemed to me that supporting a tiny subset of the GPX standard is, in my eyes, sufficient for JOSM - load a

Re: [josm-dev] New GPX implementation

2009-05-06 Thread Russ Nelson
Frederik Ramm writes: > I don't, however, see a pressing need to support any and all extended > GPX features. Actually, JOSM makes a fine GPX editor. Great for removing those birds nests when you stopped for lunch. -- --my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com Cloudmade supports http://op

Re: [josm-dev] R: R: R: FW: [OSM-newbies] JOSM problems - is it just me?

2009-05-06 Thread Michael Bemmerl
Fabrizio Carrai schrieb: > > It has been closed. The problem has been considered to belong to Java and > > not to JOSM (no fix). > > I'll keep continue to update the Java VM... :-( I have the same problem and I think Java 1.6.0_09 or so introduced this issue. I have other Java apps running (e.g.