On 24.03.2015 09:50, Jochen Topf wrote:
This way we have:
"light green" means "we know that tag and it's accepted".
I would not require "accepted" but settle with "documented".
It should recognize complicated tags like
healthcare:speciality=ophthalmology and
parking:lane:both:parallel=on_str
Put another way: thousands of mappers will use editors like JOSM, mapping
happily. My goal here is to find ways to
give those mappers a view into the discussions behind the data. A link to
OSM weekly news for example, would fit in just as well.
This is not meant to be anything big or intrusive.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Dirk Stöcker
wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2015, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>
> Not every tag proposal of is interest to a given mapper. But perhaps this
>> will help connect
>> the right mapper to the right tag design debate.
>>
>> Your thoughts?
>>
>
> Fine if you make a
-- Forwarded message --
From: Peter Barth
Date: 2015-03-26 22:32 GMT+01:00
Subject: [OSM-dev] Reminder: GSoC Application Deadline
To: d...@openstreetmap.org
Hi all,
just a quick reminder: Tomorrow, 27.3. at 19:00 UTC is the
deadline for student applications. So if you want to ap
