btw. ;)
This one for example:
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/244
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/josm-dev
n hit the validate
button. That seems to work for me...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/josm-dev
dental moving" problem (what would be the best way you reckon?),
IMHO it should be possible to select objects in the zoom mode.
Currently clicking in that mode does nothing and it would be a
solution for those of us who "accedently move" stuff which clicking on
stuff to see what'
he selection tool so you actually have to click *on* the
node to move it, and 3 pixels next to it doesn't count.
I think the third may be a viable option, what do people think?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
_
rea += x*deltay - y*deltax
Dont' need to calculte the mean, nor test anything for direction. And
100% relaible (for non-self-intersecting polygons anyway).
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
_
it?
Thanks in advance,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/josm-dev
If everyone is happy with that I'll leave everything the way
it is for now...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreet
n again :)
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/josm-dev
ik
will be wrong).
Which, as far as I'm concerned makes the test completely useless for
natural=water. Does anything actually rely on it? The wiki page says
its important but doesn't say *why*?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[
ill of use.
The answer to your question is: yes, there is a use (house number
entry) but when we'll get around to it... who knows
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
___
jo
want, no?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/JOSM_search_function
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
t;
>
>
> ___
> josm-dev mailing list
> josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
>
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>> In my opinion it is extremely bad form for your first email about a
>> project to be "let's refactor the codebase".
>
> Can you quote an examp
setting I can use for telling JOSM to use 0.6 instead of
> 0.5 as the api version in the url?
There's the preference osm-server.version which you need to set to 0.6.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/
___
speccing the API and no-one had any problem with the commit
message bit. That's not to say it's wrong, but it's more just that
JOSM supported API 0.6 very early on and got the code to match the
spec exactly (if JOSM didn't follow the spec it could hardly be
expected anyone else
15 matches
Mail list logo
