On Sun, 11 Oct 2015, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Shouldn't the Main-Version in the MANIFEST.MF now also include Debian
instead of SVN? Or should we just keep stripping the SVN string?
I'd keep the stripping of SVN text. No need to add Debian there as well.
Ciao
--
http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (P
On 11-10-15 13:31, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2015, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>
>> On 10-10-15 00:01, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
>>> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>
> No. As you mark it as Debian in the agent it's correct to strip the
> SVN
> text. This patch
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 10-10-15 00:01, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
No. As you mark it as Debian in the agent it's correct to strip the SVN
text. This patch as far as I remember was designed in cooperation with
me. For SVN
On 10-10-15 00:01, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>
>>> No. As you mark it as Debian in the agent it's correct to strip the SVN
>>> text. This patch as far as I remember was designed in cooperation with
>>> me. For SVN we react different in tickets - We tell
On 10-10-15 16:04, Vincent Privat wrote:
> Speaking of Debian patches, I think you should also remove the "macosx"
> folder, like what is done for the "windows" folder.
I had considered that too when I reviewed the repacking rules in the
get-orig-source target, but decided not to bother for ~300 k
Speaking of Debian patches, I think you should also remove the "macosx"
folder, like what is done for the "windows" folder.
You may also remove from build.xml the following targets: mac, distmac,
distwin
You can also remove xmltask.jar from tools directory (it is only used to
build the OSX package)
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
No. As you mark it as Debian in the agent it's correct to strip the SVN
text. This patch as far as I remember was designed in cooperation with
me. For SVN we react different in tickets - We tell the user first to
update to recent SVN version assum
2015-10-09 21:44 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg :
> We still don't have JCS packaged for Debian, but thanks to Emmanuel
> Bourg there is some progress on this front with the upload of the jcache
> spec.
>
> I'm currently working on updating the JOSM package to 8800 using the
> embedded JCS and ne
On 09-10-15 21:27, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the quick fixes, the Startup page now reports:
>>
>> * Active version '8159 Debian' should be updated! The current stable
>> snapshot is 8800 and 8840 is the unstable development version.
>
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Thanks for the quick fixes, the Startup page now reports:
* Active version '8159 Debian' should be updated! The current stable
snapshot is 8800 and 8840 is the unstable development version.
Well yes, that will remain a Debian problem. Will yo
On 09-10-15 17:39, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
>> Works now? Please check that it checks against tested and does not
>> tell to update unless there's really a newer one. SVN version already
>> tell you to update when a new latest is there.
>
> Need to correct me. For SVN it only tells you to update when y
Hello,
Works now? Please check that it checks against tested and does not tell to
update unless there's really a newer one. SVN version already tell you to
update when a new latest is there.
Need to correct me. For SVN it only tells you to update when you are least
50 versions behind. So it
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Is the source for the JOSM Version check, the VersionTest macro used in
StartupPageSource wiki, available somewhere?
Yes. But not public :-)
It currently is unable to handle the version used for the Debian package
which is reported as a strang
Is the source for the JOSM Version check, the VersionTest macro used in
StartupPageSource wiki, available somewhere?
It currently is unable to handle the version used for the Debian package
which is reported as a strange version:
'8159 Debian nl) Linux Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid'
This was t
Hello,
The version check for JOSM now moved totally to the server. Instead of
[[Version/running)]] which added a comment later replaced by JOSM now a
macro [[VersionTest(1|2|3|4)]] exists, which has 4 texts as argument.
1) Text for normal version display
2) Text for outdated version
3) Text for
15 matches
Mail list logo