http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/262087/government-admits-no-ie6-upgrade-until-2011.html
--DBJ
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@go
Thanks a million, that solved the problem (I feel a little silly overlooking
that one).
:-)
JK
From: jquery-dev@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery-...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of John Resig
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 1:41 PM
To: jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jquery-dev] Re:
Yes! The current nightly seems to work as expected. Thanks.
-Pete
On Jul 15, 2009, at 3:45 PM, John Resig wrote:
> Pete -
>
> Does it work with the jQuery nightlies? We made some tweaks to
> how :hidden/:visible worked in 1.3 and have since made some more
> changes to hopefully fix bugs.
>
Pete -
Does it work with the jQuery nightlies? We made some tweaks to how
:hidden/:visible worked in 1.3 and have since made some more changes to
hopefully fix bugs.
http://code.jquery.com/jquery-nightly.js
--John
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Pete Schwamb wrote:
>
> I just spent a few hou
Why not make sure that the e.target is equal to the active element before
re-firing the event?
if ( e.target === this ) {
// your code
}
--John
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Jeffrey Kretz wrote:
>
> I hate to bump this, but I haven't yet been able to figure out a solution
> --
> I'm hopin
I just spent a few hours tracking this down as well, and I'd guess
there are others out there hitting the same issue (http://
groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/
3d81f54b111c1408?fwc=1).
This does appear to work as expected in older builds (1.2.x). How was
it working there?
I hate to bump this, but I haven't yet been able to figure out a solution --
I'm hoping someone knows of a way to accomplish this result.
Thanks,
JK
-Original Message-
From: jquery-dev@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery-...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Kretz
Sent: Tuesday, July 14
I've tested it on my server uploading 140mb file, SF4 is perfect but
FF3.5 started beachballing after file selection. It seems to load the
whole file into memory, the same problem like the Flash FileReference
Class :(
On Jul 15, 5:30 pm, Andrea Giammarchi
wrote:
> The size does not matter that
The size does not matter that much, the problem is bandwidth and server
capability to receive 100Mb that server does not accept such amount in
any case and IE progress is fake so with massive files will be almost
useless but there is nothing we can do. At least the progress in IE case
will not
wow! great stuff, Andrea!
have you tested it with large (> 100mb) files too?
Thanks,
Matas
On Jul 15, 3:24 pm, Andrea Giammarchi
wrote:
> If interested, my most complete I've done so far is noSWFUpload, compatible
> with FF3, 3.5, Safari 4, IE, Opera, waiting for Chrome (they are half way
> c
P.S. build.bat should be in the same folder ... so jquery/build.bat ...
sorry I forgot to mention it.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jq
Since I had to get the latest trunk version of jQuery for latest patch, I
decided to re-adapt my work in progress "yuibompressor" to build in a click
under windows via batch files.
*
jquery/modules.txt*
intro.js
core.js
data.js
selector.js
traversing.js
attributes.js
manipulation.js
event.js
suppor
If interested, my most complete I've done so far is noSWFUpload, compatible
with FF3, 3.5, Safari 4, IE, Opera, waiting for Chrome (they are half way
compatible since they solved the zero length in input.files.item(0).length
whatever file was it).
http://code.google.com/p/noswfupload/
demo: http:
Thanks for the commit :D
Regards
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:38 PM, John Resig wrote:
> Thanks for the patch - fixed!
> http://dev.jquery.com/changeset/6436
>
> --John
>
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
Thanks for the patch - fixed!
http://dev.jquery.com/changeset/6436
--John
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Done, ticket http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4905
>
> Already successfully tested locally and online.
>
> Here a quick example about
+1
also similar Safari4 optimized code by Andrea:
http://webreflection.blogspot.com/2009/03/safari-4-multiple-upload-with-progress.html
Matas
On Jul 14, 1:35 pm, Jörn Zaefferer
wrote:
> Hey Mike, any plans on incorporating XHR upload into the form upload,
> with a fallback to iframe upload?
>
>
P.S. obviously the jquery file should contain at the end parent rather than
window ... is the only difference between jQuery and jQuery from a sandbox,
once the patch will be applied ;-)
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Done, ticket http:
Done, ticket http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4905
Already successfully tested locally and online.
Here a quick example about how to obtain a jQuery from a sandbox without
affecting anything around and being able to use jQuery in presence of other
libraries such Prototype.
*iframe src page*
// rea
Sure - sounds reasonable to me.
--John
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> John, I just realized latest from trunk has a window variable and an
> undefined one.
>
> I need to change the core.js file then to make window replacement
> availab
John, I just realized latest from trunk has a window variable and an
undefined one.
I need to change the core.js file then to make window replacement available.
document = window.document,
is that OK?
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> N
Wow, 39 minutes for self-filing and self-fixing ?! Is this a
record ;o)
--DBJ
On Jul 15, 12:50 am, John Resig wrote:
> This one was tricky because we've never explicitly said *not* to use
> multiple elements in wrap, just that you should have one. There were two
> options:
> - Ignore the remai
21 matches
Mail list logo
