Is 1.3.2 released? There's been no announcement but the jQuery home
page says
Current Release: v.1.3.2
and it says 1.3.2 in the file that downloads...
On Feb 19, 8:36 am, John Resig jere...@gmail.com wrote:
I've filed a bug and will be following up:http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4195
--John
i have found a bug in the 1.3.2 alpha.
when i clone one or more selected option from one select to
another there are differences between IE and firefox.
in IE the cloned element (in the second select) stays selected.
in firefox the cloned element is not selected.
so which one is correct?
the
I've filed a bug and will be following up:
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4195
--John
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:26 AM, lhwpa...@googlemail.com
lhwpa...@googlemail.com wrote:
i have found a bug in the 1.3.2 alpha.
when i clone one or more selected option from one select to
another there are
I just tested and it's working again after some of the recent changes:
http://jsbin.com/ajuja
Thanks for the test case!
--John
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Nikola nik.cod...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried out a few things with 1.3.2pre and noticed that the Dialog
window doesn't open in
John,
thank you for the nice additions and fixes, the document order is
really welcome :-)
Just a minor thing I noticed in the new code source is about older
Opera (probably 9.27 and older). Opera have implemented the
sourceIndex property too but it starts at index 0 for the
documentElement.
So
Whoops... spoke to soon. The show method is throwing errors in IE 6. The
main issue is that IE 6 doesn't like setting this[i].style.display to
undefined. Second, it looks like the second for loop is sitting within the
first for loop when I believe the intention was to have them separate, not
The dual loop is actually a huge speed-up. If we set the display
inside the first loop (and then check the computed display of the next
element) this causes a fresh reflow of the page. For every single
element that we show/hide. Last check this is giving us a 2x speedup
(even with the extra loop
How many days, do you reckon, from alpha until release for 1.3.2?
On Feb 16, 5:30 pm, John Resig jere...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not supported but a swtch to a typeof check seems simple enough.
Thanks for the tip.
--John
On 2/16/09, Diego Perini diego.per...@gmail.com wrote:
John,
Do you still have those speed tests for this around. I'm more curious why it
speeds things up than anything else. I understand why it speeds things up in
hide... just not understanding how we are gaining any performance in show.
--
Brandon Aaron
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:26 PM, John Resig
On Feb 16, 12:31 pm, John Resig jere...@gmail.com wrote:
There were some logic changes ... how :visible/:hidden work
Previously, elements with visibility:hidden were not :visible, but now
they are (tested in IE6,FF3). Was this an intentional change?
Matt Kruse
Depends how many bugs are spotted - hopefully not many.
--John
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:36 PM, mike.helgeson mike.helge...@gmail.com wrote:
How many days, do you reckon, from alpha until release for 1.3.2?
On Feb 16, 5:30 pm, John Resig jere...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not supported but a
Previously, elements with visibility:hidden were not :visible, but now
they are (tested in IE6,FF3). Was this an intentional change?
Yes. Previously bugs would occur with methods like height/width,
hide/show, and animate (which only operated on the display property)
but the :visible and
12 matches
Mail list logo
