Hi
Looks just i have been waiting for , it fits my needs (or i fit in the
niche ;) .
Looking forward to see whats up next !
-R©M
So Jörn - made it to the tabloids ;))
I hope without a foto so you will be mysterious for the rest of your
community live in jQuery :P
Congrats
-Cees
On Aug 10, 12:12 am, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jQuery Team Member Jörn Zaefferer has had a jQuery article published in
>
@ work !
Problem solved after implementing Thickbox 3.1 !
Thanks to Klaus for investing time and effort into this problem ,
Cody for releasing Thickbox 3.1 ;))
-Cees
It seems like the problem is solved : Cody has release thickbox 3.1 !
One of the release notes : Updated to jQuery 1.1.3.1 ;)
Problem is disappeared - at least at home - have to check my @ work
tomorrow to be sure.
Let you know :D
-Cees
that Top is still at 50% - this gives no
problems are is it taken into the calculation ?!?
-Cees
Hmm
Done some digging : alert(document.documentElement.scrollTop) gives
correct numbers.
For this.offsetHeight i get Undefined - is this correct ?!?
-Cees
ument.documentElement && document.documentElement.scrollTop ||
> document.body.scrollTop) + 'px');
Tried it - no difference. Added z-index:103 to see if the rule is
applied and it is.
Maybe some alerts in thickbox.js can give us a clue about what is
happening ? I'm glad to do so :D
-Cees
ent : http://javascript.about.com/library/bliebug.htm ?!?
I entered javascript:alert(document.compatMode); in my IE6 session at
it returns with CSS1Compat FYI.
Hope this information is helpfull.
-Cees
On Aug 8, 3:10 pm, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to know if the bug occurs in IE 7 or IE 6? The expression is
> used to emulate fixed positioning in IE 6, IE 7 supports fixed positioning.
Bug only occurs in IE6 (btw IE7 runs in Standards mode for my page).
Hmm - browsing through the topic i read this at the top :
On Aug 6, 9:15 pm, "Andy Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a page which contains a long listing of records. When I scroll down
> to the bottom, and click the thickbox trigger link, thickbox opens the modal
> window, but it's a
Done some digging :
On Aug 7, 9:08 pm, polyrhythmic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I first noticed this problem with 1.1.2 + Thickbox 3, and from my
> testing I believe it is a problem with the thickbox CSS, not with
> jQuery itself.
Hmm - but if i switch back to Jquery 1.1.2 the problem is gone o
On Aug 7, 7:23 pm, "Andy Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The weird thing is that it works just fine in FF. And the base code even
> works just fine in IE on the demo version found
> here:http://jquery.com/demo/thickbox/
>
> Just not in my code.
Not so strange it works in FF - it is a IE6
On Aug 7, 3:13 pm, "Andy Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you using a frameset in your image gallery?
>
> The only thing I can think of is that we're using a frameset in our admin
> panel.
>
I have the same problem - i do not use a frameset.
As polyrythmic noted, i am also thinking abou
Hi Joel,
Thx very much for the examples you made - i am a fan of vertical menus
and your examples matches my taste very wel ;-))
As for the highlighting of active node - i think that is not a part of
the Superfish method and should be handled outside it - its not that
hard to do with some CSS co
> There is any reason not to simply replace the image and be done with it?
>
> --
> Jörn Zaefferer
>
> http://bassistance.de
Nope - there is no reason to not do it this way :P
After i posted the reply i went to the Thickbox site and saw that the
loading image is a seperate download - so everyone
On May 4, 2:01 am, "Glen Lipka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for updating. :)
> I think I liked the old "loading" animation more. It had flair.
>
> Glen
I agree with you Glen - one can always keep the old image but that
would put me 'of standard' - maybe it is possible to choose which
16 matches
Mail list logo
