I cannot check how well they would work together right now, but
dd_roundies (http://www.dillerdesign.com/experiment/DD_roundies/) is a
great and easy to apply jQuery plugin for creating rounded corners.
On 21 Jul., 08:32, JC systeminthegli...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, another superfish question (my
I guess I could also create a global object, and then store all the
variables and functions in there. But in this case it's not so
important, because the widget will be the only content on the page and
loaded into an iframe.
On 21 Jul., 13:25, Jules jwira...@gmail.com wrote:
I found out that
Hi Fabrice,
the first thing I would do is search the jQuery plugins pages (there
is a category for menus: http://plugins.jquery.com/project/Plugins/category/44),
or simply search for something like jquery menu slide in Google/Bing/
Yahoo...
Cheers
On 7 Jul., 11:14, fabrice.regnier
Hi,
I'm not a JS/jQuery expert, so as a quick test I added alert
(actOnElem); inside your $(eventElem).click( function(), and the
result always was #dataToReveal12.
As mentioned, I am not an expert and still learning myself, but I
think on dom ready the loop simply starts running until i equals
);
$(this).click(function() {
actOnElem.slideDown();
return false;
})
});
Cheers
On 4 Jul., 12:59, olsch01 ollo...@web.de wrote:
Hi,
I'm not a JS/jQuery expert, so as a quick test I added alert
(actOnElem); inside your
;
$(.dataReveal).each(function () {
var actOnElem = #dataToReveal +i;
$(this).click( function() {
$(actOnElem).slideDown();
return false;
});
i++;
});
olsch01 wrote:OK, I guess this is one possible solution
they now have class
dataReveal.
i=1;
$(.dataReveal).each(function () {
var actOnElem = #dataToReveal +i;
$(this).click( function() {
$(actOnElem).slideDown();
return false;
});
i++;
});
olsch01 wrote:OK
Agreed :)
Will check that one now.
Thanks once more, Karl!
On 4 Jul., 17:41, Karl Swedberg k...@englishrules.com wrote:
--Karl
Karl Swedbergwww.englishrules.comwww.learningjquery.com
On Jul 4, 2009, at 5:49 AM, north wrote:
As far as elements getting hidden goes, there is a pretty
parts = this.id.split( _ );
$(#peekaboo_ + parts[1]).toggle(slow);
return false;
})
});
On 4 Jul., 23:30, Blake Senftner bsenft...@earthlink.net wrote:
First off, I'd like to sincerely thank both olsch01 and charlie for
their help, as well
and by jQuery version, but the point to keep in
mind is that selectors perform differently in very complex pages - and of
course those are the pages where you care the most.
-Mike
From: olsch01
Hi Karl,
thanks for your reply.
I used jQuery tester in FF2 + 3, IE6, 7 + 8, Opera 9.64 and I
think
a discernible bottleneck, I wouldn't worry too much about
optimizing them.
But it's interesting to play around with those tests. :)
Cheers
On 3 Jul., 09:28, olsch01 ollo...@web.de wrote:
@Karl: o, that was a serious cp bug... :) I was aware that IE6
and 7 don't support
I also read about using $ or j if you're variable stores a jQuery
object.
Maybe this might sound stupid, but what if you first do something like
this:
var $showFeedback = $('#showFeedback' +spanIdNo);
(or var jShowFeedback = $('#showFeedback' +spanIdNo); respectively)
And if you then want to
Interesting. That was quite a while ago... :)
Thanks, Karl!
On 3 Jul., 15:55, Karl Swedberg k...@englishrules.com wrote:
On Jul 3, 2009, at 3:48 AM, olsch01 wrote:
I also read about using $ or j if you're variable stores a jQuery
object.
Maybe this might sound stupid, but what
Hi,
try these:
http://stilbuero.de/jquery/history/
http://www.asual.com/jquery/address/
http://www.overset.com/2008/06/18/jquery-history-plugin/
http://www.mikage.to/jquery/jquery_history.html
http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/Blogs/BlogDetail.aspx?BlogId=1210
Cheers
On 2 Jul., 15:19, Amit
Hi, I'm not a 100% sure if that's want you want, but take a look at
(especially the examples):
http://docs.jquery.com/Ajax/jQuery.getJSON
Cheers
On 2 Jul., 14:35, DaNieL daniele.pigned...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys, i just leanerd the existence of the ajaxSubmit jQuery plugin,
im wondering if
Hi Karl,
thanks for your reply.
I used jQuery tester in FF2 + 3, IE6, 7 + 8, Opera 9.64 and I think
also in Safari 4 (on my Win XP machine). The results were are all
kinda similar. Using the class selector was always fastest.
I just ran the following test (choosing jQuery 1.3.2 again):
Thanks for the answers, guys.
I should have done what Ricardo did, and post a small code example.
Using an ID is (probably) always faster than using a class, since it
maps to the native JS method getElementById (even though there are
browsers which also support getElementsByClassName -
18 matches
Mail list logo
