On Apr 4, 10:48 pm, Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feedback desired:
!-- Old Internet Explorer -- Lately, I have been developing CSS
and HTML for a deep Web 2.0 complex app.
Usually, I avoid CSS hacks like the plague. But recently, I have had to
resort to the Holly Hack or the
!--[if lt IE 7]
link rel=stylesheet href=ie.css type=text/css
![endif]--
I think the alternative is for people who want to keep their classes
together even if some of them are browser specific.
For example, in the app I am working on the CSS is enormous. (dont ask)
And the whole thing
Hi.
I love this idea, it's inventive and the need is there.
The only feedback I have is that CSS that depends on JS will absolutely
not fly where I work and play.
Nathan
Feedback desired:
Lately, I have been developing CSS and HTML for a deep Web
2.0 complex app. Usually, I avoid
Glen Lipka schrieb:
I hear everyone's points. I think the easy to remove it in 2012
argument doesn't resonate for me, since anything created today will be
changed within 1-3 years (in my experience) and IE6 isn't going away
that soon. The screen-reader/mobile stuff seems like they would
Good Articles. I found it interesting to think about that hacks should be
ugly.
I think your point about browser specific sheets is well taken. Firebug
makes this a good thing when you see what styles are applied and can see
which file they are in. I wish IE had similar.
Another article I
5 matches
Mail list logo
