[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad

2007-07-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After using dean edwards packer and then gzip output, 15k will be pretty close to 2kI imagine. On Jul 10, 5:34 pm, "Glen Lipka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You used :-) rather than :) > > The nose adds wrath. Plain as the nose on my face. > > Glen > > On 7/10/07, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad

2007-07-10 Thread Rey Bango
He hasn't. I've incurred it and your wrath leaves lasting effects. ;) Mike Alsup wrote: Oh my! How could I have been so wrong? I hope you've recovered! Mike On 7/10/07, Glen Lipka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You used :-) rather than :) The nose adds wrath. Plain as the nose on my face.

[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad

2007-07-10 Thread Mike Alsup
Oh my! How could I have been so wrong? I hope you've recovered! Mike On 7/10/07, Glen Lipka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You used :-) rather than :) The nose adds wrath. Plain as the nose on my face. Glen On 7/10/07, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wrath? But I used a smiley!

[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad

2007-07-10 Thread Glen Lipka
You used :-) rather than :) The nose adds wrath. Plain as the nose on my face. Glen On 7/10/07, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wrath? But I used a smiley! Mike On 7/10/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You have incurred the wrath of Alsup. Poor you! ;) > > Glen Lipka w

[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad

2007-07-10 Thread Mike Alsup
Wrath? But I used a smiley! Mike On 7/10/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You have incurred the wrath of Alsup. Poor you! ;) Glen Lipka wrote: > Sorry, you are right. I just did a quick size check, I didnt think > about the comments. > My bad. mea culpa! :) > > Glen > > On 7/10/07

[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad

2007-07-10 Thread Rey Bango
You have incurred the wrath of Alsup. Poor you! ;) Glen Lipka wrote: Sorry, you are right. I just did a quick size check, I didnt think about the comments. My bad. mea culpa! :) Glen On 7/10/07, *Mike Alsup* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Glen, It's not

[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad

2007-07-10 Thread Glen Lipka
Sorry, you are right. I just did a quick size check, I didnt think about the comments. My bad. mea culpa! :) Glen On 7/10/07, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Glen, It's not fair to judge a plugin's file size from the raw source. It's like saying jQuery is 60K. Many plugins, like bl

[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad

2007-07-10 Thread Mike Alsup
Glen, It's not fair to judge a plugin's file size from the raw source. It's like saying jQuery is 60K. Many plugins, like blockUI and the form plugin, have extensive commenting - complete with examples. I think blockUI packs down to 5K which is still larger than Protoload, but nowhere near 15

[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad

2007-07-10 Thread Rey Bango
LOL! That was the same thing I thought of when I saw it this morning. Rey John Resig wrote: This is exactly what's done by blockUI: http://www.malsup.com/jquery/block/#element In fact, it's almost identical - I wonder if they got some inspiration from blockUI? --John On 7/10/07, Glen Lipka

[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad

2007-07-10 Thread Glen Lipka
I was sort of thinking like BlockUI Lite. Block UI is 15K. It does alot more than this little thing does. But sometimes you just need the little thing. Glen On 7/10/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: LOL! That was the same thing I thought of when I saw it this morning. Rey John Resi

[jQuery] Re: ProtoLoad

2007-07-10 Thread John Resig
This is exactly what's done by blockUI: http://www.malsup.com/jquery/block/#element In fact, it's almost identical - I wonder if they got some inspiration from blockUI? --John On 7/10/07, Glen Lipka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I noticed this new ajax loading script. http://aka-fotos.de/protolo