On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Kody Thompson kodythomp...@gmail.comwrote:
How can I get rid of the slide effect on a basic horizontal menu? I
love the way the basic example works but I can't mimic it without
having the text all slide to right and re-sizing the box. I know this
is a stupid
if you can post a link to view problem, there's likely an easy
resolution. All that came through on this post was a mountain of url's
posh beck wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Kody
Thompson kodythomp...@gmail.com
wrote:
How can I get rid of the slide effect on a basic
Hi there Ian,
Your best bet would be to target your second level li and a's
specifically so that you end up with the default as you currently have
it but then also:
.sf-menu li ul li, .sf-menu li ul li a
{
background-color:#330; /* different from the top level */
}
You can of course
Thank you for your help! I got it working! For future reference,
here's the CSS code I ended up using:
.sf-menu li:hover, .sf-menu li.sfHover,
.sf-menu a:focus, .sf-menu a:hover, .sf-menu a:active {
background: #1a2618;
outline:0;
}
.sf-menu li ul
Awesome, glad I could help out.
twinskies...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for your help! I got it working! For future reference,
here's the CSS code I ended up using:
.sf-menu li:hover, .sf-menu li.sfHover,
.sf-menu a:focus, .sf-menu a:hover, .sf-menu a:active {
background:
1. This is normal behaviour for all links in IE6 as it
confuses :active with :focus (or somesuch). You could workaround it by
calling blur() on the link upon click, if I remember correctly.
Personally, I just allow this bug to happen in IE6 now - not that I am
saying that is the right thing to
Hi...thanks for your interest. Unfortunately I can't give you a link
because it's on an intranet. I guess I'm beyond help.
Thanks again for the reply.
On Jan 21, 11:23 am, David Meiser dmei...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have a link? It's a little hard to diagnose without being able to
see the
Do you have a link? It's a little hard to diagnose without being able to
see the problem(s).
Thanks!
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:04 AM, mckag001 tmcka...@gmail.com wrote:
I have superfish dialed in great except for two little issues.
1. In IE6, whenever I hit the back button after clicking
Hello,
Yes, that sounds pretty much correct. If you want to generate the HTML
for the menu dynamically, you need to initialise Superfish after you
have done that, rather than before. Hope this helps.
Joel Birch.
Hello Willie!!
I never used a superfish plugin, but I believe that is not so hard to
make a superfish *not* activate the drop-down,
You need to take a look in the code javascript and the css of the
plugin...Delete or change part of the code...
Instead of hover use something like onclick...
Hi Abba,
I can only guess that you mean that in Firefox the type sometimes
shifts one pixel after the animation is complete. My experiments show
that this is likely something to do with Firefox rounding off relative
units such as em units for line-height, vertical padding and possibly
font-sizes
Hello,
How about this - or something very like it:
$(document).ready(function() {
$('ul.nav').superfish().click(function(){
$(this).hide();
});
});
I guess clicking anywhere in the nav is suitable. Might not need to
attach the click handler to the links really. You may want to
Sorry - I interpreted your request wrong I think. Try this instead:
$(document).ready(function() {
$('ul.nav').superfish(/*options if required*/).find('li').click(function() {
$(this).hideSuperfishUl();
});
});
...untested, but you never know your luck. Actually, you can
Thanks Joel, you rock.
I ended up going with
$(document).ready(function() {
$('ul.nav').superfish().click(function(){
$(this).find(ul).hide();
});
});
So the original menu is still there, sometimes new items open in a new
window, so I didn't want
Thanks Jacob.
I wondered if you would be interested in checking out my initial
attempt at adding the callback function feature. A beta version of the
new JS file is here:
http://users.tpg.com.au/j_birch/plugins/superfish/superfish-1.3.2b.js
That file should work with whatever example you have
Hey Joel,
Thanks for the excellent and clear response. I personally really
appreciated the detail and thoroughness of it. Good luck on
implementing the function call(s) and thanks for continuing to refine
your extremely handy plugin.
Cheers,
Jacob Stuart
On Sep 16, 11:25 pm, Joel Birch [EMAIL
Joel,
Good work, it seems to function as intended. Unfortunately, I can't
really use it for my purposes. You implemented it exactly as I had
requested, but what that translates into for my code is the shifting
of the drop-down's left position occurs after the animation to reveal
it is complete.
Hi Karl,
Thanks for the kind words. I wondered if it was too much info, but if
anyone got something out of it then that's great.
The starting point you have given me regarding the callbacks is
exactly what I was hoping for - I'll be looking into that the first
chance I get. I really appreciate
Hi again,
So here's what happened. Between jQuery versions 1.1.2 and 1.1.3 the
animation engine was completely rewritten. Some of the behaviour that
Superfish was built upon was changed, such that show(), fadeIn() and
similar custom animations would no longer work unless the item was
first
Hey Joel,
That was a great post. I think you've done a great service to the
community in revealing some of the process involved in keeping your
plugin up to date and improving it. Thanks. Your commitment to making
Superfish an excellent, solid plugin is much appreciated.
I'm by no means
Hi Jacob,
I don't have time right now to reply in as much detail as I would
like, but I will make time to do so tomorrow. Short answer is: it
seems like that line is not needed anymore so feel free to remove it
as future versions of Superfish will not include it.
I'll respond properly when I
Oh, and thanks very much for pointing this out! Much appreciated.
Joel Birch
Thanks for the reply Joel. If it is indeed something that isn't really
needed then you can take all the time you need ;).
Cheers,
Jacob Stuart
On Sep 14, 6:06 am, Joel Birch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jacob,
I don't have time right now to reply in as much detail as I would
like, but I will
23 matches
Mail list logo
