On Wed, Jul 04, 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007, Diego A. wrote:
Hi John (and the team),
Congratulations on the new release, it's looking great. Can't wait for
1.2...
The only small problem I've had is with an old plugin I've been used
for a while, which
Thanks Ralf, you've been a great help.
I'll see what I can do with this...
On 05/07/07, Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007, Diego A. wrote:
Hi John (and the team),
Congratulations on the new release,
Yeah, this was a really unfortunate change that had to be made. We
really wanted to keep the extensible functionality of [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it
ended up being just to incredibly slow. Moving all of the code
internal was the only way to receive any sort of speed up. Sorry about
that guys.
On 7/5/07, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, this was a really unfortunate change that had to be made. We
really wanted to keep the extensible functionality of [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it
ended up being just to incredibly slow. Moving all of the code
internal was the only way to receive
I would like to help but you've lost me there Aaron...
Is it possible to attach an else to the if statement that replaced it[1]
that checks in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 05/07/07, Aaron Heimlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/5/07, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, this was a really
Basically, I'm wondering if something like this is feasible:
if ( (type == !!z ||
type == = z == m[5] ||
type == != z != m[5] ||
type == ^= z !z.indexOf(m[5]) ||
type == $= z.substr(z.length - m[5].length) == m[5] ||
(type == *= || type == ~=) z.indexOf(m[5]) = 0) ^
Possibly. While that would, functionally, work - it would provide a serious
speed hit (requiring that each available [@] expression be parsed for
every element that isn't matched.
Although, that would only be in the case of when you include [@] checks.
Aaron - you should file a ticket for this
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007, Diego A. wrote:
Hi John (and the team),
Congratulations on the new release, it's looking great. Can't wait for
1.2...
The only small problem I've had is with an old plugin I've been used
for a while, which adds regular expression selectors:
(function($){
8 matches
Mail list logo
