[jQuery] Re: jQuery Package Downloader

2008-10-13 Thread Karl Swedberg
Nice work on the packager, Stuart. It's something we've considered including in the past, but never implemented -- except, of course, for jQuery UI. One drawback of offering a public packager such as this one is that it makes third-party troubleshooting and support quite a bit more

[jQuery] Re: jQuery Package Downloader

2008-10-12 Thread Isaak Malik
Very interesting, such a feature should be implemented on the main jQuery website. On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 8:35 PM, stuartloxton [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Just to let you all know even though this is my first post it may seem a tad spammy but it's not. It just happens I didn't have an account

[jQuery] Re: jQuery Package Downloader

2008-10-12 Thread Alexandre Plennevaux
maybe and then, maybe not, depending on the case : the kilobyte footprint of jquery minified is light, compared to the footprint of additional server requests for each additional file to load.at the very least, a production website should have all its javascript compiled into one single minified

[jQuery] Re: jQuery Package Downloader

2008-10-12 Thread Isaak Malik
Alexandra, it doesn't necessarily mean that every developer uses all the jQuery features. Some might only need the core feature while some the AJAX features, this will give them the opportunity to customize their framework. On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Alexandre Plennevaux [EMAIL