The blankety-blank reply to address on this list still defaults to only the
original sender
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
> Brien Voorhees wrote:
>
> > I just recently subscribed to this list and have already found several
> > of your posts to be useful. Thanks for spreading the knowle
Hi,
I always have to remember to hit reply all instead of reply so I'm with
you on this one, Craig ;). I also agree with Brian, I find most of your
posts to be very useful and clear so thanks.
Now back to the point, regarding the topic of restricting access to the
JSP/servlet applications I follo
I've interspersed a few comments and notes in the discussion below.
Daniel Lopez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I always have to remember to hit reply all instead of reply so I'm with
> you on this one, Craig ;). I also agree with Brian, I find most of your
> posts to be very useful and clear so thanks.
> Now
Craig:
First, thanks for your comments, they are vey useful.
Second, I've two questions in relation to the solution you propose for
session security.
-Does the creation of a new bean for every session impacts on performance?
-Do you think is a good idea to rely on this solution for keeping user
Does any body have idea that for the servlet, once I change the form method
from get to post, I get 405 ERROR.
Jashua Ni
-Java programmer---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-tel: (646) 227-5480 ext138--
===
"Juan M. Gargiulo" wrote:
> Craig:
>
> First, thanks for your comments, they are vey useful.
>
> Second, I've two questions in relation to the solution you propose for
> session security.
>
> -Does the creation of a new bean for every session impacts on performance?
A bean that you store in a se
Hi,
Comments over comments ;), I've cut some pieces of the mail so it
doesn't grow too much.
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> I've interspersed a few comments and notes in the discussion below.
>
> Daniel Lopez wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > 1 .- You first divide your logical application into "domains
Daniel Lopez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Comments over comments ;), I've cut some pieces of the mail so it
> doesn't grow too much.
>
I will shorten it some more and address just a couple things. Pretty soon there won't
be
anything left ...
> > > I was writing a paper about it as I find it quite interes