PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Kyle Cordes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 8:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Model 2 & 3 Architecture
>
>
> The biggest weakeness I see with XSLT based output is that,
> frankly, it
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: Model 2 & 3 Architecture
> Mike,
> my response was to the following extract...
>
> For simple data models and simple transforms, XSLT will work just
fine.
> But if you've tried to build complex web p
Mike,
my response was to the following extract...
For simple data models and simple transforms, XSLT will work just fine.
But if you've tried to build complex web pages using XSLT
(for one thing, it cannot operate on multiple XML documents at the same
time),
.. which I interpret as multiple inpu
omeone else.
- Mike Van Riper
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew S Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 7:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Model 2 & 3 Architecture
>
>
> Just a quick observation on a stat
Just a quick observation on a statement being repeated in several messages -
namely that a single XSL file cannot process multiple XML documents.
This is not actually true - it might not be a standard capability of all
XSLT processors but LotusXSL comes with specific examples for handling
multiple
Hi David,
Again, comments intermixed ;).
David Wall wrote:
> > I am going to start by making a bold statement, then support that
> statement
> > with my observations. After introducing XML + XSLT into your architecture
> > the need for Java Server Pages disappears!
>
> This seems somewhat true
Hi Jonathan,
Comments intermixed ;).
Jonathan Hager wrote:
> I am going to start by making a bold statement, then support that statement
> with my observations. After introducing XML + XSLT into your architecture
> the need for Java Server Pages disappears!
Well, there's no need to JSP in any
Hi Andrew,
I agree with you, but I don't care as much about sticking to the Model-View
perspective as getting something manageable and easy to use. I mean, I'd rather
introduce the ability of configuring the way the data is formatted in the model
(XML) so the view (XSL) is simpler and my designer
Hi Ryan,
Eummm, I already knew how to get the HTML from the XML+XSL with JSP(model 2++)
:). What I was asking was how people is implementing model ++2, which gets at
design time the JSP from the XML and the XSL.
Anybosy that's using this model can enlighten us?
Thanks,
Dan
"Shriver, Ryan" wrote:
> I am going to start by making a bold statement, then support that
statement
> with my observations. After introducing XML + XSLT into your architecture
> the need for Java Server Pages disappears!
This seems somewhat true to me, but it may also be a big step backwards in
terms of capabilities.
I am going to start by making a bold statement, then support that statement
with my observations. After introducing XML + XSLT into your architecture
the need for Java Server Pages disappears!
The Model 2 architecture follows the MVC pattern. The MVC pattern makes a
lot of sense for dividing th
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Lopez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 12:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Model 2 & 3 Architecture
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure too whether what you call Model ++2 would
> q
so
that if the static HTML is changed, it can incorporated into the
corresponding JSP seamlessly without doing something like windiff ??
-Original Message-
From: Shriver, Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Model 2 &
Hi Daniel,
I agree that the lack of taglibs does make the ready-to-go XSL tags much
more appealing.
On the subject of the data-type formatting though, I really think you are
going to have to address this in more detail at some point.
First, variations in format (should they occur) require you to
I've been following this discussion and find your example below interesting.
I've also been reading about tab librarys and just downloaded JRun's most
recent one (ships with JRun 3.0 CR1). The library isn't tied to JRun
specifically, but there's a feature that might help out with this. I haven't
a
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew S Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 9:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Model 2 & 3 Architecture
>
> 3. building XSL files is a radically different proposition to
> building
IL PROTECTED]
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Lee Elenbaas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 2:31 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Model 2 & 3 Architecture
> >
> >
> > What i have learned is from liste
Hi Andrew,
Very interesting feedback, I'll add my own experience.
Andrew S Tomlinson wrote:
>
> It's interesting to hear about the broader adoption of XSL in a "Model 3".
> I was (and still am) an enthusiastic adopter of XSL but I'd like to add a
> cautionary
> note and remark that from my exper
, 2000 2:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Model 2 & 3 Architecture
>
>
> What i have learned is from listening in this list.
> Model 2 is setting a single entrance servlet to all your
> JSPs. that servlet
> performs common tasks like ID user and secuity test
I finally had a chance to catch up with the JSP email list, and found this Model 3
discussion to be both interesting and very timely. I am currently redesigning our
architecture to include XML. We currently use JSP (.91 spec right now, but we will
upgrade when we upgrade our entire architecture).
It's interesting to hear about the broader adoption of XSL in a "Model 3".
I was (and still am) an enthusiastic adopter of XSL but I'd like to add a
cautionary
note and remark that from my experience:
1. XSL is non-procedural and although it is incredibly easy to use for
rudimentary
operations it
-
From: A mailing list about Java Server Pages specification and reference
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Germán López Castro
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Model 2 & 3 Architecture
Hi-u-all.
I think I've got a black hole in my acknoledgement, but
Hi-u-all.
I think I've got a black hole in my acknoledgement, but... could
anyone explain me what model 2 & 3 architectures are exactly and
where can I get further information?
Thanxalot.
Consigue tu dirección de email gratis y permanente en http://WWW.LETTERA.NET
Ýo u
Hi-u-all.
I think I've got a black hole in my acknoledgement, but... could
anyone explain me what architecture 2 & 3 are exactly and where can I
get further information?
Thanxalot.
Consigue tu dirección de email gratis y permanente en http://WWW.LETTERA.NET
Ýo unsubscr
24 matches
Mail list logo
