Re: OFFTOPIC Standard SQL -- WAS: RE: jsp and NT

2000-06-02 Thread Daniel Lopez
elpful on this but we've kind of reached the limit of my knowledge on this topic. -Original Message- From: ryoung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 1:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OFFTOPIC "Standard SQL" -- WAS: "RE: jsp and NT&q

Re: OFFTOPIC Standard SQL -- WAS: RE: jsp and NT

2000-06-01 Thread Jim Bailey
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OFFTOPIC "Standard SQL" -- WAS: "RE: jsp and NT" Jim Bailey wrote: "Make sure that you use as much standard SQL as possible and not Oracle's PL-SQL unless you want to be tied to Oracle." Does anyone know an Internet resource that r

Re: OFFTOPIC Standard SQL -- WAS: RE: jsp and NT

2000-06-01 Thread ryoung
-Original Message- From: A mailing list about Java Server Pages specification and reference [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Bailey Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 11:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OFFTOPIC "Standard SQL" -- WAS: "RE: jsp and NT" s

Re: OFFTOPIC Standard SQL -- WAS: RE: jsp and NT

2000-06-01 Thread Jim Bailey
] Subject: Re: OFFTOPIC "Standard SQL" -- WAS: "RE: jsp and NT" snip Third, don't use stored procedures. Only access the database through JDBC statements. since i've inherited a system where i may only be allowed access [SqlServer7] through stored procedures [nego

Re: OFFTOPIC Standard SQL -- WAS: RE: jsp and NT

2000-06-01 Thread Bip Thelin
since i've inherited a system where i may only be allowed access [SqlServer7] through stored procedures [negotiations still going on with the vendor/partner], is this a performance observation, or an error observation?? What you gain from using StoredProcedures is performance and enhanced