Does anybody else have a problem with a
"production-quality" servlet engine also serving as the reference
implementation for servlets and/or JSP?
I have always operated under the belief that a "reference
implementation" was supposed to be plain-vanilla, no optimizations,
stick-to-the-lett
Ted Neward wrote:
> Does anybody else have a problem with a "production-quality" servlet
> engine also serving as the reference implementation for servlets
> and/or JSP? I have always operated under the belief that a "reference
> implementation" was supposed to be plain-vanilla, no optimizations
From: "Scott Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Tomcat isn't really a reference implementation. It's the Apache group's
> servlet implementation. Sun has chosen, for its own reasons, to select
> the Apache group as its preferred servlet vendor. Calling Tomcat a
> "reference implementation" is j
m/~tneward
-Original Message-
From: Ronald van Kuijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Scott Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Ted Neward
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 7:44 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat-as-a-reference imp
But what about the watchdog part (http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog/index.html) of
Tomcat then? I think it is better to develop a reference platform independently of
one vendor. Sun, IBM and others are involved in Tomcat/Watchdog.
Ronald
Scott Ferguson wrote:
> Ted Neward wrote:
>
> > Does an
"Scott Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ted Neward wrote:
> > Does anybody else have a problem with a "production-quality" servlet
> > engine also serving as the reference implementation for servlets
> > and/or JSP? I have always operated under the belief that a "reference
> > implementatio
gt; Date:Wed, 16 Feb 2000 11:05:29 -0500
> From:"Stark, Scott (Exchange)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Tomcat-as-a-reference implementation?
>
> I agree with this logic from a vendors perspective. Conformance should be
> based on a well defined compatab
