Re: Using for params in URLs

1999-11-22 Thread David Wall
If a new version of HTTP specifies the use of ';' rather than '', the servlet engine could detect the HTTP version and decode appropriately. What I don't understand is why it's a "problem" for HTTP at all, since it seems to work just fine right now. I don't think it requires a new HTTP version

Re: Using for params in URLs

1999-11-22 Thread Wes Biggs
David Wall wrote: If a new version of HTTP specifies the use of ';' rather than '', the servlet engine could detect the HTTP version and decode appropriately. What I don't understand is why it's a "problem" for HTTP at all, since it seems to work just fine right now. I don't think it

Re: Using for params in URLs

1999-11-21 Thread Wes Biggs
David, Good question. If a new version of HTTP specifies the use of ';' rather than '', the servlet engine could detect the HTTP version and decode appropriately. Personally I'm not holding my breath. So many existing programs, CGI and otherwise, depend on ampersand-separated arguments, it

Re: Using for params in URLs

1999-01-17 Thread Taylor Gautier
- From: David Wall To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 19, 1999 10:27 AM Subject: Using for params in URLs Everything I read related to HTML 4.0 is that the to separate parameters (based on the older CGI convention) has been deprecated. The W3C suggests

Re: Using for params in URLs

1999-01-17 Thread David Wall
- From: Taylor Gautier To: David Wall ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 19, 1999 4:43 PM Subject: Re: Using for params in URLs Umm, no, to be honest I have never heard of such a thing. It sounds as if you are referring to URL's, and I don't