You think that's bad? I get emails from myself all the time with viruses
in them...
:0
nick
--- Ollie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bummer
-Original Message-
From: Warner Onstine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:44:05
To:jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org
Subject: Re:
IBM developerWorks has published both parts of Nick Lesieckis two-part
article series Enhance design patterns with AspectJ. This article is a
part of the peer-reviewed [EMAIL PROTECTED] series.
In this article, Nick shines a new light on traditional OO design patterns
from an AOP perspective:
Hi everyone,
Thanks for the many recommendations. Unfortunately (?) at a place like
Google, the command-line mumbo jumbo is a big part of my requisite
knowledge. I am in the middle of learning the bash shell by Newham and
Rosenblatt. So far it's good, though I was hoping for more here's what you
OGNL
Nick
--- Tim Colson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So just assume for a moment that RAM is cheap and you decided to load
100K
objects into memory. Assume those objects were Employees... you can
imagine the fields would be the usual suspects. Assume each employee is
associated with a profile
Don't hold back Drew, tell us how you really feel!
:)
Nick
--- Drew Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Warner Onstine wrote:
One short topic I thought might be interesting would be Groovy. Has
anyone done anything with it yet? Willing to share?
I can critique the Groovy hand-written
Hey,
I rememeber a discussion on this list about tools for JAR slimming:
ditching all the classes in a JAR than can be proved by static analysis to
be unused by your code. Does anyone else remember this and can they tell me
what the tools were that accomplished this feat?
Cheers,
Nick
Yep, sorry for this one too. Dratted reply-all.
Cheers,
Nick
--- Nicholas Lesiecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin,
Didn't you ask me to speak at this SIG meeting on AspectJ? I thought I'd
already confirmed in the affirmative. In any case, I'm happy to postpone
since I'll have a lot going
+1 Large gecko by Tim Colson/TJUG green gecko diagonal by Tim Colson (only
difference is size)
+1 Eduardo
Cheers,
nick
--- Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
We've finally got several logos to choose from for the website logo.
You can view the logo entries at:
Hi Martin,
I didn't meet you at Barnes and Noble, but I did coauthor Java Tools for
XP. are you interested in having both Rick and I speak? If you're
interested, I'd love to hear more details.
Cheers,
Nick
--- Martin Lapidus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings.
We me at BarnesNoble several
I got caught by it too. Sorry all.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Warner says:
I'd prefer not to [cover EJB/CMP] for a few reasons:
1) While I know that it is a kind of O/R it is not the kind I am
interested in at the moment
What kind are you interested in?
2) It isn't standalone - it requires an EJB container
Point taken, but every framework requires
See more below:
--- Warner Onstine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 06:14 PM, Lesiecki Nicholas wrote:
Warner says:
I'd prefer not to [cover EJB/CMP] for a few reasons:
1) While I know that it is a kind of O/R it is not the kind I am
interested
Nick ( or anyone else ) have you worked with EJB 2.x stuff?
Yep, it's all we use at eBlox. We use Resin as our EJB and servlet
container and it has served us very well. The crucial savings comes through
the use of CMR and EJB-QL. We use local entity beans so performance hasn't
been an issue for
Hah! you should post that to slashdot. It will start WWIII.
Cheers,
Nick
--- Randolph S. Kahle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I run Linux on my workstation. On top of Linux I run vmware and Windows
2000.
Eclipse runs faster on Windows2000 in vmware than natively in Linux.
Strange...
I think
+1 From Me too...
--- Rick Hightower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for SWT
-Original Message-
From: Simon Ritchie [mailto:simon.ritchie;amo.com]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 4:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse is better on Windows
Warner
I got a TiBook for 3000 with an Airport base station and a Copy of Office
for Mac. Without those the price was like, $2400.
Very sweet.
Cheers,
Nick
--- Jon Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Go to Computech and play with an iBook to see if you like it
-Original Message-
From: Rick
Sorry, gotta work on the book! I'm behind.
Any word on the errata page?
Cheers,
nick
--- Rick Hightower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any takers? I know a few people at eBlox know XDoclet pretty well.
Nick? Paul? Andy? Come on
Something big came up and I have to cancel the XDoclet
Whoops! Reply all instead of reply. Everyopne who isn't Rick can ignore the
bit about the errata page.
Cheers,
nick
--- Lesiecki Nicholas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, gotta work on the book! I'm behind.
Any word on the errata page?
Cheers,
nick
--- Rick Hightower [EMAIL PROTECTED
I'm conflicted! It sounds great, but I can't be there!
(We're building FOP-based PDF generation into one of our
sites currently.)
Cheers,
Nick
--- Thomas Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank-you Rene. +1 more for this!
-tom
At 07:35 PM 8/8/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Hi all,
I can
+1 and Thanks for taking over Simon!
Cheers,
Nick
--- Presentations [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have had an offer from SolarMetric Inc
(http://www.solarmetric.com
) to do a presentation on Java Data Objects (JDO) at the
October 8 meeting.
Because the speaker will be travelling, they need
20 matches
Mail list logo
