On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Charles Butler
wrote:
> Big +1 to the categories
>
> What i'd like to see is the policy document move to strong language where we
> can build tooling around the automated checking of policy.
>
> Refactoring the MUSTS and SHOULDS give us a strong lead on that langua
On 20/03/16 20:21, roger peppe wrote:
> If the released Juju 2.0 uses v5 of the charmstore API (which it will
> soon hopefully anyway when my branch to support the new publishing
> model lands), then there's a straightforward solution here, I think:
> change v4 of the charmstore API to refuse to se
If the released Juju 2.0 uses v5 of the charmstore API (which it will
soon hopefully anyway when my branch to support the new publishing
model lands), then there's a straightforward solution here, I think:
change v4 of the charmstore API to refuse to serve min-juju-version
charm archives to clients
Another feature which will be in the next beta is support for keystone 3 in
Openstack.
On 18/03/16 04:51, Rick Harding wrote:
> tl;dr
> Juju 2.0 beta3 will not be out this week.
>
> The team is fighting a backlog of getting work landed. Rather than get the
> partial release out this week with the
tl;dr +1 for thedac
I've worked on charms with David since the ol' pyjuju days. He has made
numerous excellent contributions to the Openstack charms, charmhelpers and
charms from the wider community. He is also an excellent reviewer and can
be depended on to give a merge proposal a thorough dissec
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:24 AM Merlijn Sebrechts <
merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As an aside; is there a good write-up somewhere about charm unit testing.
> I'd like to do this but I'm not sure how to do this. I am completely new to
> unit testing so I'm having a hard time to see how a go
+1 for all of those.
I'd also like to have a way to get files from charms other than using juju
scp. An example of this is getting vpn config from the openvpn charm...
Op vrijdag 18 maart 2016 heeft Tom Barber het
volgende geschreven:
> Couple of new things cropped up today that would be very us
tl;dr
Juju 2.0 beta3 will not be out this week.
The team is fighting a backlog of getting work landed. Rather than get the
partial release out this week with the handful of current features and
adding to the backlog while getting that beta release out, the decision was
made to focus on getting the
Bundles must only use charms which are already in the store, they cannot
reference charms in personal namespaces.
I assume this apples to only bundles that get promoted to recommended
otherwise how would you enforce it?
--
Director Meteorite.bi - Saiku Analytics Founder
Tel: +44(0)56
