I'm quite surprised to see an 'agent-state: stopped' and life: dead with an
'agent-status: ... executing'.
If the agent really is dead, then there is nothing for the hooks to run on.
Is this particular unit (nrpe/20) running on a machine that has other
services running on it, or was it the last
>
> ...
>
> +### tuple ### allow any 8000 0.0.0.0/0 any 0.0.0.0/0 in
> +-A ufw-user-input -p tcp --dport 8000 -j ACCEPT
> +-A ufw-user-input -p udp --dport 8000 -j ACCEPT
> +
>
>
If I'm reading this one correctly, it also means that anyone from *any* IP
address (not restricted to your local
>
> ...
>
> +### tuple ### allow any 8000 0.0.0.0/0 any 0.0.0.0/0 in
> +-A ufw-user-input -p tcp --dport 8000 -j ACCEPT
> +-A ufw-user-input -p udp --dport 8000 -j ACCEPT
> +
>
>
If I'm reading this one correctly, it also means that anyone from *any* IP
address (not restricted to your local
My concern about your last configuration is that it appears to change your
squid deb proxy into an open proxy by which anything can make a request to
any website. At least that is my understanding of:
http_access allow all
(Its no longer a 'deb' proxy, its just a plain http proxy.)
That may be
OK, I think I've got it now.
On 16/08/16 15:19, Ian Booth wrote:
On 16/08/16 12:58, Tim Penhey wrote:
On 16/08/16 10:50, Ian Booth wrote:
On 16/08/16 03:09, Nate Finch wrote:
Ian, can you describe how Juju decides if it's running for a developer or
an end user? I'm worried this could
On 16/08/16 12:58, Tim Penhey wrote:
>
>
> On 16/08/16 10:50, Ian Booth wrote:
>>
>> On 16/08/16 03:09, Nate Finch wrote:
>>> Ian, can you describe how Juju decides if it's running for a developer or
>>> an end user? I'm worried this could trip people up who are both end users
>>> and happen
Hi Alexander,
Great to hear fellow kiwis interested.
The dealing with artifacts is exactly the problem that resources were
designed to fix. A charm defines the resources it needs and as the charm
is deployed, it also has the resources fetched.
Personally I've not used any charms yet that
Hello everyone, I'm brand new to Juju, so first I'll say thanks for the exciting
project, I really think that Juju takes the right approach to deployment.
I will be using Juju to help software development companies build deployment
automation for their own work. The first requirements I'm
On 16/08/16 03:09, Nate Finch wrote:
> Ian, can you describe how Juju decides if it's running for a developer or
> an end user? I'm worried this could trip people up who are both end users
> and happen to have a juju development environment.
>
It's not so much Juju deciding - the use cases
Yes thanks for doing the work to share this menn0. It is much appreciated.
I also needed to change the following in squid-deb-proxy (even though I
added a bunch of domains to
/etc/squid-deb-proxy/mirror-dstdomain.acl.d/10-default):
--- a/squid-deb-proxy/squid-deb-proxy.conf
+++
Yes thanks for doing the work to share this menn0. It is much appreciated.
I also needed to change the following in squid-deb-proxy (even though I
added a bunch of domains to
/etc/squid-deb-proxy/mirror-dstdomain.acl.d/10-default):
--- a/squid-deb-proxy/squid-deb-proxy.conf
+++
Hi,
I'm looking for some help with a charm stuck in a dying state.
nrpe/20:
workload-status:
current: terminated
since: 12 Aug 2016 10:57:55Z
agent-status:
current: executing
message: running stop hook
I have a charm stuck dying. Nothing I do seems to solve the issue. How can I
delete or remove the stuck charm
nagios:
charm: cs:trusty/nagios-10
exposed: true
life: dying
service-status:
current: unknown
message: Waiting for agent initialization to finish
Thanks Rafael. Would you mind adding this to the wiki page?
On 16 August 2016 at 02:31, Rafael Gonzalez
wrote:
> Hi Menno,
>
> Thanks for putting this together, great tips. I recently ran into an
> issue which others could see as well.
>
> One may need to adjust
Good catch Casey. I've just updated the config in the gist to allow access
to any mirror or PPA (in a cleaner way than in the blog article IMO). It
seems to work well (apt-get download is nice way to test).
On 16 August 2016 at 09:27, Casey Marshall
wrote:
>
Good catch Casey. I've just updated the config in the gist to allow access
to any mirror or PPA (in a cleaner way than in the blog article IMO). It
seems to work well (apt-get download is nice way to test).
On 16 August 2016 at 09:27, Casey Marshall
wrote:
>
Menno,
This is great and thanks for sharing!
In case anyone else runs into this.. charms that install from PPAs will
fail with this squid-deb-proxy setup. You'll need to allow archive mirrors
for this to work. See
https://1337.tips/ubuntu-cache-packages-using-squid-deb-proxy/ for an
example.
On
Menno,
This is great and thanks for sharing!
In case anyone else runs into this.. charms that install from PPAs will
fail with this squid-deb-proxy setup. You'll need to allow archive mirrors
for this to work. See
https://1337.tips/ubuntu-cache-packages-using-squid-deb-proxy/ for an
example.
On
There is a PR that's soon to land [edit: just landed] that will change the Juju
API so that controller-level RPC calls can no longer
be executed on a model-specific connection.
https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/5986
This is a breaking API change.
The affected facades are the following:
There is a PR that's soon to land that will change the Juju
API so that controller-level RPC calls can no longer
be executed on a model-specific connection.
https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/5986
This is a breaking API change.
The affected facades are the following:
AllModelWatcher
Ian, can you describe how Juju decides if it's running for a developer or
an end user? I'm worried this could trip people up who are both end users
and happen to have a juju development environment.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:29 AM Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> On 15/08/16 08:27,
On 15/08/16 08:27, Ian Booth wrote:
> So if you pull master you'll no longer need to use upload-tools.
> Juju will Do the Right Thing*, when you type:
Thanks Ian, this is a lovely simplification.
Mark
--
Juju-dev mailing list
Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
Hi
I have a charm that is stuck dying. It seem like the entry didn't get
updated in juju.
Is there a way to manually update the status or trigger the hooks
nrpe/20:
workload-status:
current: terminated
since: 12 Aug 2016 10:57:55Z
agent-status:
Hi Menno,
Thanks for putting this together, great tips. I recently ran into an issue
which others could see as well.
One may need to adjust the following for large bundle deployments on LXD.
A bundle deployment fails with errors about "Too many files open." This
will increase number of max
Hi Menno,
Thanks for putting this together, great tips. I recently ran into an issue
which others could see as well.
One may need to adjust the following for large bundle deployments on LXD.
A bundle deployment fails with errors about "Too many files open." This
will increase number of max
Hi Rajith,
What cloud are you installing to? Do the machines you installing on have
full network access? The version of mariadb in the store fetches mariadb
packages from a ppa provided by mariadb project. If you can't access that
ppa from the machine you're installing on, then things will break.
Last week, Kostas, Pete, and I reviewed the following:
-
IBM Installation Manager
-
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1575746
-
Good example of a charm utilizing Resources and Terms.
-
Deployed with trusty and xenial and successfully exercised
So if you pull master you'll no longer need to use upload-tools.
Juju will Do the Right Thing*, when you type:
$ juju bootstrap mycontroller aws|lxd|whatever
or
$ juju upgrade-juju
*so long as your $GOPATH/bin is in your path (as a developer).
1. As a user, you bootstrap a controller using a
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 2:13 PM Andrew Wilkins
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're making a handful of changes around model- and cloud-related APIs.
> Some of these will be broken in beta16, and some will be deprecated then
> and broken directly after.
>
> The first change is to
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 2:13 PM Andrew Wilkins
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're making a handful of changes around model- and cloud-related APIs.
> Some of these will be broken in beta16, and some will be deprecated then
> and broken directly after.
>
> The first change is to
Hi,
We're making a handful of changes around model- and cloud-related APIs.
Some of these will be broken in beta16, and some will be deprecated then
and broken directly after.
The first change is to ModelManager.DestroyModel. This method is now
deprecated, and replaced with the pluralised
Hi,
We're making a handful of changes around model- and cloud-related APIs.
Some of these will be broken in beta16, and some will be deprecated then
and broken directly after.
The first change is to ModelManager.DestroyModel. This method is now
deprecated, and replaced with the pluralised
32 matches
Mail list logo