Just to provide a little more clarity on the Azure issue.
The recent Azure SDK update changed the Azure behaviour as exposed to Juju. We
were previously not waiting for machines to be marked as fully provisioned; the
SDK now does this for us. MS says this is what you must do. The effect on Juju
is
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 1:03 PM Stéphane Graber
> Hi Rick,
>
> Hmm, so it looks like Juju itself is parsing the LXD version and failing?
>
> That's a bit weird as I'd have expected it to instead check for the API
> version (1.0) if even checking anything.
>
>
> I've been using the Juju betas with
Right and our plan is to stick to the 2.0.x bugfix releases for Xenial
and Trusty (through SRUs and backports respectively).
LXD 2.1 and later non-LTS feature releases will be available as snaps
for those who want them outside of the Ubuntu development release.
(once we're done sorting out a numbe
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 04:52:48PM +, Rick Harding wrote:
> It was caught today in Juju testing that we fail to build with the latest
> lxd 2.1 [1]. This initially seems like it's an issue in that the team
> checks for lxd versioning much too tightly. We're working to update this as
> fast as p
To be clear, lxd 2.1 is new in yakkety today and does not currently effect
xenial and previous releases.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:52 PM Rick Harding
wrote:
> It was caught today in Juju testing that we fail to build with the latest
> lxd 2.1 [1]. This initially seems like it's an issue in that
It was caught today in Juju testing that we fail to build with the latest
lxd 2.1 [1]. This initially seems like it's an issue in that the team
checks for lxd versioning much too tightly. We're working to update this as
fast as possible and doing some testing to see what's new in 2.1 that might
cau
For those wanting something newer, don't forget you also have daily builds
via the edge channel of the juju snap.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Rick Harding
wrote:
> Thanks Adam, that's in flight and I'll make sure to reach out once that
> lands.
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:00 AM Adam Isr
Thanks Adam, that's in flight and I'll make sure to reach out once that
lands.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:00 AM Adam Israel
wrote:
> Hi Rick,
>
> We have a need for the daily build with this fix in place:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1611514
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016
Hi Rick,
We have a need for the daily build with this fix in place:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1611514
Thanks!
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:26 AM Rick Harding
wrote:
> We need to delay the release of beta16 until next week as we've been busy
> breaking things and currently don't h
We need to delay the release of beta16 until next week as we've been busy
breaking things and currently don't have a working Azure in our trunk.
We've updated the Azure code we use to talk to their APIs and in the
process uncovered changes in our code that need to happen to help bring
things back
10 matches
Mail list logo
