I'm sorted. Thanks to those that replied.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016, 18:33 Reed O'Brien wrote:
> Is there anyone around tomorrow North American time or sometime (any
> timezone) next week who can guide me through getting kvm running on lxd
> locally on my system?
>
> To be
At least on the mobile site the install instructions are not properly
formatted (under getting started)
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016, 6:14 PM Jorge O. Castro wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm happy to announce that 1.5.1 is here, all charms have been pushed and
> it's ready to go.
Hello everyone,
I'm happy to announce that 1.5.1 is here, all charms have been pushed and
it's ready to go. Please refer to this blog post for the lengthy changelog,
enjoy!
http://insights.ubuntu.com/2016/12/16/announcing-canonical-kubernetes-1-5-1/
--
Jorge Castro
Canonical Ltd.
On 16 December 2016 at 22:33, Katherine Cox-Buday <
katherine.cox-bu...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Tim Penhey writes:
>
> > Make sure you also run on LXD with a decent delay to the APT archive.
>
> Open question: is there any reason we shouldn't expect charm authors to
>
On 16 December 2016 at 22:33, Katherine Cox-Buday <
katherine.cox-bu...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Tim Penhey writes:
>
> > Make sure you also run on LXD with a decent delay to the APT archive.
>
> Open question: is there any reason we shouldn't expect charm authors to
>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:33:18AM -0600, Katherine Cox-Buday wrote:
> Tim Penhey writes:
>
> > Make sure you also run on LXD with a decent delay to the APT
> > archive.
>
> Open question: is there any reason we shouldn't expect charm authors
> to take a hard-right
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:33:18AM -0600, Katherine Cox-Buday wrote:
> Tim Penhey writes:
>
> > Make sure you also run on LXD with a decent delay to the APT
> > archive.
>
> Open question: is there any reason we shouldn't expect charm authors
> to take a hard-right
Hi Juju,
Cory, Kostas, Pete, and I waded through https://review.jujucharms.com/ this
week. Here's what we found:
-
ghost
-
https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/62
-
Ghost is a simple, powerful publishing platform.
-
The charm is in a good shape (24th
Tim Penhey writes:
> Make sure you also run on LXD with a decent delay to the APT archive.
Open question: is there any reason we shouldn't expect charm authors to take a
hard-right towards charms with snaps embedded as resources? I know one of our
long-standing
Tim Penhey writes:
> Make sure you also run on LXD with a decent delay to the APT archive.
Open question: is there any reason we shouldn't expect charm authors to take a
hard-right towards charms with snaps embedded as resources? I know one of our
long-standing
On 16/12/2016, Brent Clements wrote:
> This is great info.
>
> I apologize for my ignorance but what would that, as placement for each
> unit, look like in a bundle?
For each application, it can look something like this:
an-application:
charm: ./a-charm
A new development release of Juju, 2.1-beta3, is here!
## What's new?
* Deployments to LXD containers on Xenial use the more performant
directory backend https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1648513
* Constraints placed on KVM containers in bundles are honoured
* Juju SSH improvements for the
A new development release of Juju, 2.1-beta3, is here!
## What's new?
* Deployments to LXD containers on Xenial use the more performant
directory backend https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1648513
* Constraints placed on KVM containers in bundles are honoured
* Juju SSH improvements for the
There have been a couple of reports of Juju struggling with
availability zones recently. This isn't new code, it was introduced in
1.20, but with 2.0 it appears that we're not surfacing errors from
improper zone selection[1], which is a particular issue when we also
seem to not be selecting a
14 matches
Mail list logo