Re: Juju 2.1-beta5 is here

You're using local charms (./xenial/mongodb) so it's hard to know for sure exactly what you're deploying without having the full set of files. If it is the same as the "official" mongodb: https://jujucharms.com/mongodb/ Then it has several bindings that aren't listed in your bundle. Your bundle

Re: [Review Queue]: websphere liberty, canonical-livepatch, ganglia-node, gluster, openvpn

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Merlijn Sebrechts wrote: > Thanks Cory and team! > > > I didn't test my Charm on a public cloud, which meant I had a code path that > wasn't executed before. I fixed it and used my Charm Developer Program > Credentials® verify on AWS.

Re: Juju 2.1-beta5 is here

Well this mongodb charm have not changed since trusty. I doubt that binding have been defined for this charm. So I think mechanism to define a default binding for the application where binding is not defined in charms. Also opnfv-promise application does not have any api to consume so here also

Re: Juju 2.1-beta5 is here

Narinder, so the beta5 includes the container networking changes that are required to help make sure that Juju stops guessing bindings incorrectly. If you look at the error messages in those commands you can see a new error that the beta5 presents: message: 'unable to setup network: no

Re: Juju 2.1-beta5 is here

Narinder, so the beta5 includes the container networking changes that are required to help make sure that Juju stops guessing bindings incorrectly. If you look at the error messages in those commands you can see a new error that the beta5 presents: message: 'unable to setup network: no

Re: Juju 2.1-beta5 is here

Here you go. juju status --format yaml http://paste.ubuntu.com/23927017/ juju show-machine 0 http://paste.ubuntu.com/23927020/ pastebinit bundles.yaml http://paste.ubuntu.com/23927027/ Thanks and Regards, Narinder Gupta (PMP) narinder.gu...@canonical.com Canonical, Ltd.

Re: Create Juju Charms from your browser!

And charmbox makes an appearance! Great work merlijin! I'm looking forward to giving this a spin. On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:06 PM Antonio Rosales < antonio.rosa...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On Feb 3, 2017 7:08 PM, "Junaid Ali" wrote: > > Great. Thanks Merlijn for sharing. >

Re: [Review Queue]: websphere liberty, canonical-livepatch, ganglia-node, gluster, openvpn

Thanks Cory and team! I didn't test my Charm on a public cloud, which meant I had a code path that wasn't executed before. I fixed it and used my Charm Developer Program Credentials® verify on AWS. Mentioning it because those are very useful! :) I uploaded the next version to the Charm Store;

Re: Juju 2.1-beta5 is here

Narinder, can you share the output of juju status --format=yaml and juju show-machine 0 On Sat, Feb 4, 2017, 5:15 AM Narinder Gupta wrote: > Hi Nicholas, > I am finding issues when do the deployment. Bundle i used to deploy with > juju 2.1-beta4 does not get

Re: Juju 2.1-beta5 is here

Narinder, can you share the output of juju status --format=yaml and juju show-machine 0 On Sat, Feb 4, 2017, 5:15 AM Narinder Gupta wrote: > Hi Nicholas, > I am finding issues when do the deployment. Bundle i used to deploy with > juju 2.1-beta4 does not get

Re: Juju 2.1-beta5 is here

Hi Nicholas, I am finding issues when do the deployment. Bundle i used to deploy with juju 2.1-beta4 does not get deployed with juju-2.1-beta5. Reason of that is mongodb lxd container still waiting to get machine which was not the case for juju 2.1-beta4 mongodb/0 waiting