On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 12:17 AM Marco Ceppi
wrote:
> If it's acceptable to do so, I'll propose changes to charmhelpers and
>> charms.reactive at some point. It would be nice to be able to have a core
>> set of Python helpers that work on all platforms.
>>
>
> I think instead it'd be better to br
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016, 2:12 AM Andrew Wilkins
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:30 AM Andrew Wilkins <
> andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:42 PM Marco Ceppi
>> wrote:
>>
>>> There are two things that need to be done. The first, we need the
>>> reactive framework
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:30 AM Andrew Wilkins
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:42 PM Marco Ceppi
> wrote:
>
>> There are two things that need to be done. The first, we need the
>> reactive framework to be ported to powershell - that way we can have charms
>> written in powershell and compiled
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:42 PM Marco Ceppi
wrote:
> There are two things that need to be done. The first, we need the reactive
> framework to be ported to powershell - that way we can have charms written
> in powershell and compiled as such. I know the cloud base folks poked at
> that a bit in G
There are two things that need to be done. The first, we need the reactive
framework to be ported to powershell - that way we can have charms written
in powershell and compiled as such. I know the cloud base folks poked at
that a bit in Gent during the Summit but I haven't heard much from there.
T
BTW, I don't believe this is true. I didn't work on series in metadata,
but I skimmed the code and didn't see anything doing checks for OS
consistency across the stated series. I just tried it with a charm labeled
as trusty & win10 in the metadata.yaml and it worked fine deploying to
trusty.
On
At least... according to the core code, but it occurs to me I may well be
mistaken about what's allowed by the charm authoring tools and/or
charmstore.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:16 AM Nate Finch wrote:
> BTW, I don't believe this is true. I didn't work on series in metadata,
> but I skimmed the
On 4 April 2016 at 14:17, Andrew Wilkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to write a charm that should be mostly identical on Windows and
> Linux, so I think it would make sense to have common code in the form of a
> layer.
>
> Is anyone working on getting "charm build", layers, and friends to work w
>From what I've read, there's no server-side story to Ubuntu on Windows.
It's purely desktop, and in fact, only installs on desktop versions of
Windows 10. That could help with tooling for charm authors, but obviously
the charm code itself still needs to run on vanilla Windows.
The main tricky pa
I know that Gabriel and some of the CloudBase folks seemed interested in
layers and possibly some tooling with powershell. I'm not sure how far that
went but I thought they were experimenting during the charmer's summit.
That would help with a charm build on windows, but not for some common code
be
Hi,
I would like to write a charm that should be mostly identical on Windows
and Linux, so I think it would make sense to have common code in the form
of a layer.
Is anyone working on getting "charm build", layers, and friends to work
with Windows workloads? If not, I may look into it myself.
Ch
11 matches
Mail list logo
