I've created a bug to do the CLI->API work. If there's something existing,
or a more appropriate place to do this, let me know and this can disappear.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1246983
I'm going to look at doing destroy-machine, which looks pretty trivial.
Cheers,
Andrew
--
Juju
That sounds great. I look forward to trying it out.
John
=:->
On Nov 1, 2013 5:44 AM, "Gary Poster" wrote:
> Hi all. The GUI team has a tool in alpha that we think is useful now.
> It is an opinionated way to start a great Juju experience quickly.
> We're looking for users and feedback from ea
That specific problem (struct A returning concrete struct B objects),
definitely came up in our struct vs interface discussions. It might be
better to have it as a free function rather than a method on Machine. Like a
func UnitsForMachine (machine interface {Tag ()}) [] Unit
The problem with inter
juju-core 1.16.2
A new stable release of Juju, juju-core 1.16.2, is now available.
This release replaces 1.16.0.
Getting Juju
juju-core 1.16.2 is available in trusty and backported to earlier
series in the following PPA
https://launchpad.net/~juju/+archive/stable
Resolved issues
* Azure bo
Hi all. The GUI team has a tool in alpha that we think is useful now.
It is an opinionated way to start a great Juju experience quickly.
We're looking for users and feedback from early releases.
= What does it do now? =
If you run the plugin from the commandline, it will bootstrap an
environment
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:57 PM, John Arbash Meinel
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2013-10-31 16:21, Andrew Wilkins wrote:
> > Does anybody object to converting the public entity structs in
> > state to interfaces? i.e. State, Machine, Unit, etc.
> >
> > I'd like t
On 01/11/13 08:49, Nate Finch wrote:
> Preferably, if you find yourself needing an interface that only has A,
> make an interface that only has A, and have your function use that
> interface. :)
>
> But that is a neat trick for when the above isn't possible for whatever
> reason.
Well, sometimes
Preferably, if you find yourself needing an interface that only has A, make
an interface that only has A, and have your function use that interface. :)
But that is a neat trick for when the above isn't possible for whatever
reason.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Tim Penhey wrote:
> -BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/11/13 01:57, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> On 2013-10-31 16:21, Andrew Wilkins wrote:
>> Does anybody object to converting the public entity structs in
>> state to interfaces? i.e. State, Machine, Unit, etc.
>
>> I'd like to write some tests for
Defining small interfaces is the best way to make your code testable
without making it unwieldy. The nice thing about Go interfaces is that you
don't have to make an interface that covers all your bases, since there's
very little friction to creating interfaces for your specific use case.
Often t
On 31 October 2013 05:21, Andrew Wilkins wrote:
> Does anybody object to converting the public entity structs in state to
> interfaces? i.e. State, Machine, Unit, etc.
>
> I'd like to write some tests for new code that depends on state. Setting up
> mongo and so on is overkill. and should be releg
+1
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:57 AM, John Arbash Meinel
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2013-10-31 16:21, Andrew Wilkins wrote:
> > Does anybody object to converting the public entity structs in
> > state to interfaces? i.e. State, Machine, Unit, etc.
> >
> > I'd l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-10-31 16:21, Andrew Wilkins wrote:
> Does anybody object to converting the public entity structs in
> state to interfaces? i.e. State, Machine, Unit, etc.
>
> I'd like to write some tests for new code that depends on state.
> Setting up mong
Does anybody object to converting the public entity structs in state to
interfaces? i.e. State, Machine, Unit, etc.
I'd like to write some tests for new code that depends on state. Setting up
mongo and so on is overkill. and should be relegated to integration testing.
Cheers,
Andrew
--
Juju-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-10-31 12:34, William Reade wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:37 AM, William Reade
> mailto:william.re...@canonical.com>>
> wrote:
>
> The service watch fires on any change to the document, and adding
> a unit increments the service's uni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-10-31 12:25, William Reade wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:15 AM, John Arbash Meinel
> mailto:j...@arbash-meinel.com>> wrote:
>
>>> Just to be clear for other readers (wasn't clear to me without
>>> checking the src) this isn't the agent
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:37 AM, William Reade wrote:
> The service watch fires on any change to the document, and adding a unit
> increments the service's unitcount field. The easy fix is to wrap the
> service watcher so that it discards irrelevant changes; the hard fix
> (schema change!) is to
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:15 AM, John Arbash Meinel
wrote:
> >> Just to be clear for other readers (wasn't clear to me without
> >> checking the src) this isn't the agent resolving the api server
> >> address from provider-state which would mean provider credentials
> >> available to each agent,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:57 AM, John Arbash Meinel
> wrote:
> >> Where is N^2 coming from?
> >
> > If you add N units one-by-one each new add triggers all existing units
> > to wake up and ask for the Life and CharmURL of the service aga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So I managed to instrument a jujud with both CPU and Mem profiling
dumps. I then brought up 1000 units and did some poking around.
The results were actually pretty enlightening.
1) Guess what the #1 CPU time was. I know I was surprised:
Total: 25469
20 matches
Mail list logo
