Re: Juju 2.0-beta9 ETA

2016-06-12 Thread Tim Penhey
On 12/06/16 21:00, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: From an upgrade point of view, I would focus on the migration capability, because that provides the cleanest semantics. If we have everything we need there and upgrades happen to work from b9 onwards, then that's great, but please communicate that I

Re: Juju 2.0-beta9 ETA

2016-06-12 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On the upgrade front, I think we should relax until we are comfortable calling something an RC. The reality is we are still making changes, I am concerned that making an upgrade promise too early will just slow down our ability to make changes we deem necessary before 2.0. I understand there are