Re: [julia-users] Re: 2nd Julia meetup in Japan: JuliaTokyo #2

2014-10-02 Thread Sorami Hisamoto
This time we had around 40 participants, about the same as the last event (JuliaTokyo #1) back in July. We had audiences from mixed backgrounds; physics, finance, bioinformatics, adtech, marketing and web engineering to name a few. It seems the biggest cluster of people are from R community,

Re: [julia-users] Re: 2nd Julia meetup in Japan: JuliaTokyo #2

2014-10-02 Thread John Myles White
FWIW, I think going after the data analyst community is a losing bet for Julia until a few more years have passed. The R community contains very few developers, so most of the R community couldn't possibly benefit from a young language that needs develepors, not users. It's a bad relationship

Re: [julia-users] Re: 2nd Julia meetup in Japan: JuliaTokyo #2

2014-10-02 Thread Sorami Hisamoto
I agree with that. In our meetups we generally get good reactions from the people who implement their own algorithms (theoretical physicists, machine learning researchers, etc.), but not much from the data analysts. Analyst people come up hearing about Julia much faster than R, and then after

Re: [julia-users] Re: 2nd Julia meetup in Japan: JuliaTokyo #2

2014-10-02 Thread John Myles White
Yeah, this is exactly my experience. When I first got involved with R, I spent more time with machine learning folks and less with statisticians. I naively assumed that statisticians were as savvy about programming as ML folks, which has proven to definitely not be the case. This lead me to