Re: [julia-users] Re: ASTs of complete modules/packages?

This also sounds similar to some of the issues I dealt with in some experimental code I wrote to simulate the result of precompiling modules. In `eval_expr`, I dealt with the ability to handle some expressions specially (such as `=`) and to recurse into `module` declarations. (The net goal of

Re: [julia-users] Re: ASTs of complete modules/packages?

Cool, thank you. On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Yichao Yu wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Cedric St-Jean > wrote: > > It would make sense to put .jl file-parsing code in a separate, > > community-maintained module, because the rules for

Re: [julia-users] Re: ASTs of complete modules/packages?

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Cedric St-Jean wrote: > It would make sense to put .jl file-parsing code in a separate, > community-maintained module, because the rules for finding which file a > module corresponds to are not trivial, and can change over time (they

Re: [julia-users] Re: ASTs of complete modules/packages?

It would make sense to put .jl file-parsing code in a separate, community-maintained module, because the rules for finding which file a module corresponds to are not trivial, and can change over time (they became case-sensitive in 0.5) It's too bad that macro module_parser(m) m end

[julia-users] Re: ASTs of complete modules/packages?

Hello colleague, On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 12:50:44 AM UTC+2, Cedric St-Jean wrote: > > I faced very similar issues with ClobberingReload.jl. > https://github.com/cstjean/ClobberingReload.jl/blob/master/src/ClobberingReload.jl > Check > out parse_file (courtesy of @stevengj),

[julia-users] Re: ASTs of complete modules/packages?

I faced very similar issues with ClobberingReload.jl. https://github.com/cstjean/ClobberingReload.jl/blob/master/src/ClobberingReload.jl Check out parse_file (courtesy of @stevengj), parse_module, and creload. I haven't "expanded" the includes, but it seems straight-forward to do with a