Re: [julia-users] Re: Atom package

I've been wondering the same. I don't think it would be too difficult to hook Lint.jl up

Re: [julia-users] Re: Atom package

While we're on the subject, I wonder what it would take to get linter support for Julia into Atom. On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 8:23:33 PM UTC-5, Spencer Lyon wrote: > > Excellent. Thank you. > > I've been traveling all day, but will push the code within the next 24 > hours. > > I have some exp

Re: [julia-users] Re: Atom package

Excellent. Thank you. I've been traveling all day, but will push the code within the next 24 hours. I have some experimental ideas implemented right now so my initial push will probably be accompanied by some pull requests to get comments from other users.

Re: [julia-users] Re: Atom package

Should be set now. There's only an empty repo there right now at https://github.com/JuliaLang/atom-language-julia On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 2:39:29 PM UTC-7, John Myles White wrote: > > I can create a repo. > > On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 12:04:09 PM UTC-7, Spencer Lyon wrote: >> >> John, >> >

Re: [julia-users] Re: Atom package

I can create a repo. On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 12:04:09 PM UTC-7, Spencer Lyon wrote: > > John, > > Do you have create permissions within the JuliaLang github org? > > If not, who should we contact to create the repo/set up permissions? > > I guess I could just request that my repo be transf

[julia-users] Re: Atom package

John, Do you have create permissions within the JuliaLang github org? If not, who should we contact to create the repo/set up permissions? I guess I could just request that my repo be transferred to the organization, but I'd want whoever gets that message to have a heads up.

[julia-users] Re: Atom package

Ahh that's a great distinction-- good catch. Knowing that I'd vote that the repo be named JuliaLang/atom-language-julia  // Spencer On June 11, 2015 at 9:49:28 PM MST, John Myles White wrote:Looking into this more, it looks like the repo can have any name you want. The important thing is t

[julia-users] Re: Atom package

Looking into this more, it looks like the repo can have any name you want. The important thing is that the package is named language-julia, not the repo. On Thursday, June 11, 2015 at 8:05:20 PM UTC-7, Spencer Lyon wrote: > > Good to see something for atom-language-julia. That is what the packag

[julia-users] Re: Atom package

Good to see something for atom-language-julia. That is what the package was named originally, but it wasn't maintained so it was forked and renamed language-julia. I don't think there will really be any reusable components. I just dont know another editor/tool that uses textmate style grammar

[julia-users] Re: Atom package

I see there's at least some precedent for atom-language-julia maybe? Would this plugin be entirely atom-specific, or could other editors also reuse the same code? On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 3:41:08 PM UTC-7, John Myles White wrote: > > It is

[julia-users] Re: Atom package

Oh yeah, I checked it right now. It seems that I had an older version of *julia-lang* in Atom editor by another author. This is a new version made by a francophone, I presume. Verily, no deprications whatsoever my brothers!

[julia-users] Re: Atom package

I did some work today merging the newly converted package with what is currently in the language-Julia package. It works well and there are no depreciations. I'm waiting on two thjngs: 1. To hear back from the original author to see if he is on board 2. To have someone create the repo under t

[julia-users] Re: Atom package

There are also deprecations for Julia in Atom Editor. Something is wrong there. Τη Τετάρτη, 10 Ιουνίου 2015 - 1:33:45 μ.μ. UTC-4, ο χρήστης Spencer Lyon έγραψε: > > Right now the atom package for adding syntax highlighting for Julia is > https://github.com/tpoisot/language-julia > > Based on is

[julia-users] Re: Atom package

It is a very strong convention, though. -- John On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 1:52:01 PM UTC-7, Spencer Lyon wrote: > > Definitely not a requirement, just convention. > > If there are other proposals out there I'm happy to entertain them. > > On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 1:51:07 PM UTC-7, Ton

[julia-users] Re: Atom package

Definitely not a requirement, just convention. If there are other proposals out there I'm happy to entertain them. On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 1:51:07 PM UTC-7, Tony Kelman wrote: > > Does atom require you to name the repository language-julia? I'm generally > in favor of your plan here but m

[julia-users] Re: Atom package

Does atom require you to name the repository language-julia? I'm generally in favor of your plan here but maybe a more specific repo name would be clearer, if that's possible? On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 10:33:45 AM UTC-7, Spencer Lyon wrote: > > Right now the atom package for adding syntax

[julia-users] Re: Atom package

I would love it if you followed up on those proposed changes. -- John On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 10:33:45 AM UTC-7, Spencer Lyon wrote: > > Right now the atom package for adding syntax highlighting for Julia is > https://github.com/tpoisot/language-julia > > Based on issues like this one (