I'm thinking, given that the phase map was produced by applying
Base.angle() on another (complex) matrix (say we call it M), it is this
function which caused the phase wrapping in the first place, right? So
can't I somehow get around the problem and produce the unwrapped map
directly from M?
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 8:54:27 AM UTC-8, Andrei Berceanu wrote:
I'm thinking, given that the phase map was produced by applying
Base.angle() on another (complex) matrix (say we call it M), it is this
function which caused the phase wrapping in the first place, right? So
can't I
Sorry, perhaps I did not explain myself :)
One can see the phase oscillates between -\pi and \pi.
I would like to compute how many times the phase changes by 2\pi as one
goes around the origin.
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 1:31:53 AM UTC+1, Steven G. Johnson wrote:
On Tuesday, February
I guess what I'm trying to say is that your answer makes sense for
continuous functions, while mine has jumps of 2\pi, and so the phase change
is equal to the total number of these jumps (times 2\pi). Does this make
sense?
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 11:36:51 AM UTC+1, Andrei Berceanu
Wouldn't the answer depend on the path you choose?
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Andrei Berceanu andreiberce...@gmail.com
wrote:
I guess what I'm trying to say is that your answer makes sense for
continuous functions, while mine has jumps of 2\pi, and so the phase change
is equal to the
I'm hoping it wouldn't, but it is actually one of the things I would like
to test.
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 3:17:39 PM UTC+1, Michele Zaffalon wrote:
Wouldn't the answer depend on the path you choose?
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Andrei Berceanu andreib...@gmail.com
javascript:
It seems you want to unwrap the phase (plus pi) along your path:
https://gist.github.com/ssfrr/7995008
But as you data are quite discrete, I'm not sure it will work. Maybe if you
interpolate.
On Tuesday, February 3, 2015 at 1:17:15 PM UTC-5, Andrei Berceanu wrote:
How can I numerically compute the total change in phase as one goes around
a closed loop centered on the site $m=n=0$?
Seems like
totalchangeinphase(m,n) = 0
would work and be very efficient. (As you described