Hi Kevin,
I had a look at your patch. It looks pretty good to me. Nice addition!
regards,
Larry
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Kevin Neufeld wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> You're right, I once did have write access to the old JUMP ... that was
> a long time ago. I'm surprised you remembered :
Kevin,
If Stefan hasn't beat me to it, give me your Sourceforge user name and
I'll get you write access to the SVN.
Thanks for testing the patch Larry.
Landon
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Larry Becker wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> I had a look at your patch. It looks pretty good to me. Nice
Patch has been committed at r2034, no problems. Let me know if anyone
has issues with the addition.
Thanx all,
-- Kevin
On 9/2/2010 8:29 AM, Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> You've been added to the Jump Pilot Project on Sourceforge and now
> have write access to the SVN. You can commit
I'll give it a spin in the nightly build tomorrow, but Larry is pretty
reliable. :]
Glad you got access with no problems. Welcome to the team. :]
SS
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Kevin Neufeld wrote:
> Patch has been committed at r2034, no problems. Let me know if anyone
> has issues with t
True, but I argue that 64MB or similar is acceptable for the convenience of
stringent configuration and one loader to maintain. Launch4j looks even more
promising, having one app that creates launchers for windows, linux, and osx.
It even supports the mentioned ini file.
A perfect candidate? Or
On 02.09.2010 18:28, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
> Launch4j looks even more promising, having one app that creates launchers for
> windows, linux, and osx.
I take that back. It only creates windows launchers. So essentially it does,
what WinRun4J does already. Hence back to apache's launcher.
bt
