Hi,
A long time ago we had a team splitting permanent field polygons into smaller
polygons presenting annual crops inside the fields. We had to fill in some
attributes for each crop polygon from application papers and also some data
based on our own satellite image interpretation. In that kind
On 02.01.2012 23:49, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Hi Benjain and happy new year
>
>> Let's start with the first point, since I really like to know how you guys
>> development cycle is.
>>
>> When I started with OpenJUMP back in April 2009 I typically started Eclipse
>> and opened my Project with an
Hi Benjain and happy new year
Let's start with the first point, since I really like to know how you
guys development cycle is.
When I started with OpenJUMP back in April 2009 I typically started
Eclipse and opened my Project with an Extension class and some
PlugIns. To test changes I had to
Ah, OK,
I thought you wanted to do the opposite (assign geometry from a wkt
string attribute to the geometry attribute !)
Copying geometry to a string attribute when there is only one string
attribute should now be possible (svn 2577)
Michaël
Le 02/01/2012 22:03, Rahkonen Jukka a écrit :
> Hi
Hi Jukka, all,
Interesting idea. Not an easy task, but now, most of the code exists.
Not sure what would be the benefit compared to digitizing roads noding
them in one step, then creating your polygons.
One difficulty would be to define options (all options in the new noder
plugin would also ma
Happy new year!
I did some research on the refactoring of the PlugIns in the tools menu and
want to discuss some points:
1. Software development process
2. Legacy code and testing
3. Separation of GUI and code
Let's start with the first point, since I really like to know how you guys
de
Hi Ede,
> i see that as of now there was no oj win installer on osgeo...
> http://live.osgeo.org/WindowsInstallers/
I'll see if it is compatible with space constraints of the osgeo-live dvd
> we should maybe point that out to the osgeo folks. it might be problematic as
> there is officially no op
Hi,
See
http://latuviitta.org/documents/assign_wkt_1.png and
http://latuviitta.org/documents/assign_wkt_2.png
Can be a nice feature to have sometimes.
-Jukka-
Lähettäjä: Michaël Michaud [michael.mich...@free.fr]
Lähetetty: 2. tammikuuta 2012 22:32
Vastaa
Wow, thanks
I will not be able to make a tenth of the tests you and others are doing
these days...
Michaël
Le 02/01/2012 13:59, edgar.sol...@web.de a écrit :
> On 02.01.2012 13:19, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
>> On 02.01.2012 12:13, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
>>> And Ede's Change coordinate system to
Le 02/01/2012 12:13, Giuseppe Aruta a écrit :
Hi Michael,
do we have some tools that depends on geotools on OJ core?
I don't think so
AFAIR there is a code that was added for the advanced measure tool.
Ya, a piece of code from Netbeans project, no native code, I don't think
it can be harmful
A
however, the issue looks like a graphics card redraw error, which from my point
of view is ugly but not issuing a problem with the result. and again i cannot
reproduce it with ubuntu 11.04 and openjdk6 in a virtual machine.
also, what other choice is there if osgeo really sticks with openjdk6 ..
Hi,
> Auto assign attribute tool allows to assign the geometries of features as WKT
> into a string attribute.
Ho do you do that ? Have you got a screenshot ?
Michaël
> However, this option is not active before having two normal attribute
> fields in the scheam in addition to the geometry fie
>> but a question.. how do you deal with layers that have lots of objects?
>> (OJ would be in-responsive)
>
> how is the noder plugin dealing with it? is it capable to find overlaying
> geometries (in a performant manner) or are they manually selected beforehand?
The noding is done on a whole la
On 02.01.2012 17:31, Stefan Steiniger wrote:
> so you mean activating the other plugin right after a feature is
> finished by double click?
programmatically yes. meaning in the code that draws there is a noder plugin,
if there then it checks if autonoding is on, if on then it calls the noding
p
so you mean activating the other plugin right after a feature is
finished by double click?
but a question.. how do you deal with layers that have lots of objects?
(OJ would be in-responsive) and: How do you know which geometry type is
of interest?
Not saying it is not working, but it may be mo
i forward this to the user list and ask if there are others that'll find that
useful.
..ede
On 02.01.2012 16:52, Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
> Yes we have. Idea came into my mind when translating new strings and trying
> how the new Noder tool and Fill polygon tool are working.
>
> -Jukka-
>
>> --
Yes we have. Idea came into my mind when translating new strings and trying how
the new Noder tool and Fill polygon tool are working.
-Jukka-
> -Alkuperäinen viesti-
> Lähettäjä: edgar.sol...@web.de [mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de]
> Lähetetty: 2. tammikuuta 2012 17:46
> Vastaanottaja: Ope
Don't we have a plugin that does that for selected geometries? If so we could
run that immediately after in a special drawing mode or by demand, done.
ede
On 02.01.2012 15:46, Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
> Yes, automatically after the new feature is finished.
>
> -Jukka-
>
>> -Alkuperäinen vies
Yes, automatically after the new feature is finished.
-Jukka-
> -Alkuperäinen viesti-
> Lähettäjä: edgar.sol...@web.de [mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de]
> Lähetetty: 2. tammikuuta 2012 16:44
> Vastaanottaja: OpenJump develop and use
> Aihe: Re: [JPP-Devel] Automatic noding when adding new fea
so autonoding would be to create points on intersections of line segments of
overlapping geometries during drawing?
ede
On 02.01.2012 14:35, Stefan Steiniger wrote:
> nodes refers here the intersection of lines/polygon-borders, a term from
> geometry/toplogy ("Schnittpunkt" or "Knoten" in Germa
nodes refers here the intersection of lines/polygon-borders, a term from
geometry/toplogy ("Schnittpunkt" or "Knoten" in German)
Am 02.01.12 13:17, schrieb edgar.sol...@web.de:
> if somebody could explain what nodes are i might be able to comment on
> possible implementability.
>
> ..ede
>
> On
On 02.01.2012 13:19, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
> On 02.01.2012 12:13, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
>> And Ede's Change coordinate system tool, Anyhow right now I don't see any
>> difference on using OpenJUMP tools (whether or not depending on geotools
>> classes). Anyhow I agree with you to test those
On 02.01.2012 12:13, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
> And Ede's Change coordinate system tool, Anyhow right now I don't see any
> difference on using OpenJUMP tools (whether or not depending on geotools
> classes). Anyhow I agree with you to test those tools.
tested cts-0.2 successfully with openjdk7 for
if somebody could explain what nodes are i might be able to comment on possible
implementability.
..ede
On 02.01.2012 12:05, Stefan Steiniger wrote:
> Hi Jukka,
>
> I wish we could do that - but I doubt... its creation of topology on the
> fly, and that would require some additional internal s
Hi,
Auto assign attribute tool allows to assign the geometries of features as WKT
into a string attribute. However, this option is not active before having two
normal attribute fields in the scheam in addition to the geometry field in the
schema. One available attribute would be enough in this
On 02.01.2012 12:13, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> do we have some tools that depends on geotools on OJ core? AFAIR there is a
> code that was added for the advanced measure tool. And Ede's Change
> coordinate system tool, Anyhow right now I don't see any difference on using
> OpenJUMP t
Hi Michael,
do we have some tools that depends on geotools on OJ core? AFAIR there is a
code that was added for the advanced measure tool. And Ede's Change coordinate
system tool, Anyhow right now I don't see any difference on using OpenJUMP
tools (whether or not depending on geotools classes).
Hi Jukka,
I wish we could do that - but I doubt... its creation of topology on the
fly, and that would require some additional internal structures (to keep
things in memory and to parse it...) that we don't have as far as I know.
cheers,
stefan
Am 02.01.12 10:37, schrieb Rahkonen Jukka:
> Hi,
thanks, that helped
stefan
Am 02.01.12 07:43, schrieb Michaël Michaud:
> Hi Stefan,
>
>> what is the effect for the option "aggregate unused fields", in the new
>> union plugin?
> Aggregate fields in the result (if the user choose field A for union,
> other fields B, C... are aggregated
> with a
i see that as of now there was no oj win installer on osgeo...
http://live.osgeo.org/WindowsInstallers/
we should maybe point that out to the osgeo folks. it might be problematic as
there is officially no openjdk for windows. however i found an openjdk7 i586
reference build dual on
http://jdk7.j
Hi all
While regular drawing tools allow to show right click context menu (sometimes
useful to access zoom tools), constrained tools don't. If I click on the right
mouse button, the drawing is stopped and the feature is created. I wonder if it
make sense to have 2 different ways to draw feature
if openjdk 1.7 solves this we should urge (although i am under the impression
osgeo already plans to) osgeo to include this version.
michael: could you communicate this plus the fact that oj is generally fit for
openjdk?
ede
On 02.01.2012 10:20, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
> Hi all,
> this is my ex
Hi,
Could it be possible to create automatically nodes into the intersecting
features when creating new lines or polygons? That would suit extremely well
with the new Fill Polygon digitising tool. Two use cases: User could digitise
first the streets as lines and thanks to automatic noding creat
Hi all,
this is my experience with OJ and JRE.
Some months ago I tested the same bug with OpenJDK 1.6 which is embedded in
Ubuntu 11.04.
This bug was always present with all tools that were involving parts of the
features "outside" the view, plus "Draw constrained circle" tool.
I did some tests
34 matches
Mail list logo
