Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ 2.x Was:Re: JTS update: first experiments

looks unmaintained with last commit being from 2017-05-24 https://sourceforge.net/p/gvsigce/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/sextante/ ..ede On 11.08.2020 08:31, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > Hi Eric > > - This is the link to GvSIG CE SVN of Sextante: > https://svn.code.sf.net/p/gvsigce/code/trunk/sextante > > - R

[JPP-Devel] Git Repo ids Was:Re: OJ 2.x Was:Re: JTS update: first experiments

working mail addresses will be difficult to get for everyine and generally unnecessary as well. just need to keep the history and committer ids to enable retracing changes in the future as well. ..ede On 10.08.2020 15:52, Eric wrote: > Here is the list of all the SVN authors (and their number o

Re: [JPP-Devel] Git Repo ids Was:Re: OJ 2.x Was:Re: JTS update: first experiments

The problem is that email addresses are required to be able to keep the authors. A solution could be to use the email addresses for the active developers and to use another generic email address for all the others (this one could be one created for this sole purpose using gmail). This would t

Re: [JPP-Devel] Git Repo ids Was:Re: OJ 2.x Was:Re: JTS update: first experiments

Eric, surely we can use whatever we decide as "email" as long as it fit's the syntax or? as all of these are sf.net users we could simply use the @users.sourceforge.net . ..ede On 11.08.2020 11:50, Eric wrote: > The problem is that email addresses are required to be able to keep the > authors

[JPP-Devel] Licensing GPL2'd OJ vs. EPL2'd locationtech JTS

hey All, just noticed that locationtech relicensed JTS to EPL2, which as far as i read it is incompatible to the GPL (any version). https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/faq.php#h.mz8pxljvc07w the mentioned "Exhibit A — Form of Secondary Licenses Notice" seems to be empty in JTS' version of the

[JPP-Devel] [jump-pilot:bugs] #496 OpenJUMP 1.15 freezes on loading project files from differing versions

--- ** [bugs:#496] OpenJUMP 1.15 freezes on loading project files from differing versions** **Status:** open **Created:** Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:35 AM UTC by ede **Last Updated:** Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:35 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody as described by Peppe on the mailing list " *On loading project fi

Re: [JPP-Devel] Licensing GPL2'd OJ vs. EPL2'd locationtech JTS

Hi, JTS is dual-licensed under: - Eclipse Public License 2.0 - Eclipse Distribution License 1.0 (a BSD Style License) This second licence, if BSD style, should normally be compatible with the GPL one. Eric On 11/08/2020 11:28, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: hey All, just noticed that locationt

[JPP-Devel] [jump-pilot:bugs] #496 OpenJUMP 1.15 freezes on loading project files from differing versions

Thanks Ede, you were faster ;-) > [bugs:#496] OpenJUMP 1.15 freezes on loading project files from differing > versions Status: open Created: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:35 AM UTC by ede Last > Updated: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:35 AM UTC Owner: nobody as described by Peppe on > the mailing list " On loading

Re: [JPP-Devel] Licensing GPL2'd OJ vs. EPL2'd locationtech JTS

Hi again, "The Eclipse Distribution License is an OSI Approved Open Source License by means of the New BSD License ". Source: https://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/edl-v10.php The New BSD License refers to a 3-Clause BSD License. Source: https:

Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ 2.x Was:Re: JTS update: first experiments

tl;dr let's wait how the licensing issue (other email) turns out, apart from that my answers below. On 10.08.2020 15:42, Eric wrote: > Hi Ede, > > Thanks for your welcome and for your answers. See my inline replies for some > of them (I deleted the other parts). > > On 09/08/2020 16:40, edgar.so

Re: [JPP-Devel] Licensing GPL2'd OJ vs. EPL2'd locationtech JTS

Eric, sounds plausible. Jody. maybe you can add GPL'd software as another example in https://github.com/locationtech/jts/blob/master/FAQ-LICENSING.md ? thanks.. ede On 11.08.2020 12:58, Eric wrote: > Hi again, > > "The Eclipse Distribution License is an OSI Approved Open Source License by > me

Re: [JPP-Devel] Licensing GPL2'd OJ vs. EPL2'd locationtech JTS

looks like the geoserver folks added an exception for EPL and others to their GPL2. https://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/introduction/license.html unfortunately we cannot relicense our sources as we cannot get the ok from _all_ developers/companies having laid hands on it over time. but eve

Re: [JPP-Devel] Licensing GPL2'd OJ vs. EPL2'd locationtech JTS

Jody, understood. thanks for clearing that up! what's the advantage of the EPL2 then if you are essentially also licensed BSD-style? or asked differently why would anyone use the EPL when you can license the product without any restriction whatsoever as well? ..ede On 11.08.2020 16:06, Jody Ga

Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ 2.x Was:Re: JTS update: first experiments

Hi Ede, Thanks. I let the licencing issue aside as it seems to be resolved. See my inline answers. On 11/08/2020 12:01, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: tl;dr let's wait how the licensing issue (other email) turns out, apart from that my answers below. On 10.08.2020 15:42, Eric wrote: Hi Ede, T

Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ 2.x Was:Re: JTS update: first experiments

Hi Eric Open discussion: *>>- The idea is to create a temporary Git project/repository as Ede mentioned too. There are two main platforms for that, GitHub and GitLab. Let me know which one you prefer, knowing that it is possible to have both solutions, working only on one, with a mirroring for th