Re: [JPP-Devel] AdB-ToolBox: a word about future developments

2010-02-14 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Hei Alberto, good to hear that you could adapt your algorithms to the sextante model. but to your questions. > > I still have some things I'd like to clarify: 1) to implement symbology > management for raster, would it be needed to modify the sextante > classes? I don't think so - but I may be

Re: [JPP-Devel] AdB-ToolBox: a word about future developments

2010-02-11 Thread Alberto De Luca
Stefan, I had a look at the sextante classes you included in you sstein branch. They look promising. There is an easy way to access raster cell values, and I also had a go trying to adapt one of our plug-ins to use these classes. It worked. Actually, instead of modifying the plug-in code I cr

Re: [JPP-Devel] AdB-ToolBox: a word about future developments

2010-02-08 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Hei Michael, Alberto and Larry, yep. What I was suggesting is to use IRasterLayer and the related generic classes and basically copy them with a slight name change to avoid confusion [1]. This way we could develop on raster functionality based on the sextante interfaces and access classes. I.e

Re: [JPP-Devel] AdB-ToolBox: a word about future developments

2010-02-08 Thread Michaƫl Michaud
Hi Stefan, Sorry, my knowledge about raster managment is very poor. I thought you already added Sextante raster classes (File> Open> Image raster (Sextante)) Isn't it enough to benefit from Sextante algorithm library ? Could you briefly explain what is missing in OpenJUMP. From what you and Albe

Re: [JPP-Devel] AdB-ToolBox: a word about future developments

2010-02-08 Thread Larry Becker
> I actually asked a couple of months ago if other people would accept if > I commit the basic Raster classes used in Sextante. There was not much > exitement/repsonse ;) > Sorry for the lack of response Stefan. I just haven't had time to study Sextante, and didn't feel qualified to comment. Larr

Re: [JPP-Devel] AdB-ToolBox: a word about future developments

2010-02-08 Thread Alberto De Luca
Stefan, Peppe and all, I've always looked at the Sextante extension with interest, considering the vast amount of tools it includes. But to be honest, I haven't had the chance to study it thoroughly. I see that OpenJUMP can already open "Sextante Raster Images", including TIFF images. I thin

Re: [JPP-Devel] AdB-ToolBox: a word about future developments

2010-02-05 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Hei all, I actually asked a couple of months ago if other people would accept if I commit the basic Raster classes used in Sextante. There was not much exitement/repsonse ;) However, I still think it would be a good idea, so we could with low efforts use/adapt Sextante raster functions. So far

Re: [JPP-Devel] AdB-ToolBox: a word about future developments

2010-02-05 Thread Larry Becker
> > once the raster > is loaded, and "translated" into an RGB image to be shown in AdB, it > loses the actual pixel data information (it's just an RGB image). We > think that a step forward would be to load the raster values into an > array to be kept in memory, whose values could be used by any pl

Re: [JPP-Devel] AdB-ToolBox: a word about future developments

2010-02-05 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Alberto, I'm copying this message to Stefan, who heads up the administration and development of OpenJUMP. However, I think I can express the OpenJUMP's interest in collaborating with the AdB-ToolBox development team. It sounds like you have been doing great work with OpenJUMP, and a couple of our

[JPP-Devel] AdB-ToolBox: a word about future developments

2010-02-05 Thread Alberto De Luca
Hello everyone. As a member of the team who has been working on AdB-ToolBox in the last months, I'd like to address a couple of issues regarding its future developments: internationalization, raster management and platform independence. By the way, AdB-ToolBox is a piece of software, part of t