Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded

2020-08-17 Thread edgar . soldin
gt; > -Jukka Rahkonen- > > -Alkuperäinen viesti- > Lähettäjä: edgar.sol...@web.de > Lähetetty: sunnuntai 16. elokuuta 2020 19.51 > Vastaanottaja: OpenJump develop and use > ; Giuseppe Aruta > ; Michaud Michael > Aihe: Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded > > done i

Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded

2020-08-17 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
> Sometimes, > >> third party libraries just become more strict, > >> > >> and in that case, it can be useful to fix the code on OpenJUMP side > >> whatever the final solution choosen. > >> > >> Michaël > >> > >>

Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded

2020-08-17 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
t become more strict, >> >> and in that case, it can be useful to fix the code on OpenJUMP side >> whatever the final solution choosen. >> >> Michaël >> >> envoyé : 16 août 2020 à 14:31 >> de : edgar.sol...@web.de >> à : OpenJump develop an

Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded

2020-08-16 Thread edgar . soldin
;> >> and in that case, it can be useful to fix the code on OpenJUMP side >> whatever the final solution choosen. >> >> Michaël >> >> envoyé : 16 août 2020 à 14:31 >> de : edgar.sol...@web.de >> à : OpenJump develop and use , >> Giuseppe Aruta

Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded

2020-08-16 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
: OpenJump develop and use , > Giuseppe Aruta > objet : Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded > > > On 16.08.2020 13:07, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > > Hi all, > this issue was not closed: moving to newer batik broke SVG export for both > embedded OpeJUMP "Export view" an

Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded

2020-08-16 Thread Michaud Michael
Hi,It would be nice to know exactly what is wrong with batik1.13. Sometimes, third party libraries just become more strict, and in that case, it can be useful to fix the code on OpenJUMP side whatever the final solution choosen.Michaël envoyé : 16 août 2020 à 14:31de : edgar.sol...@web.deà : Open

Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded

2020-08-16 Thread edgar . soldin
On 16.08.2020 13:07, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > Hi all, > this issue was not closed: moving to newer batik broke SVG export for both > embedded OpeJUMP "Export view" and CadPlan Printer view plugin. yeah, didn't hear back from you guys. so we are agreed thta i'll roll back the upgrade to the latest

Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded

2020-08-16 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
Hi all, this issue was not closed: moving to newer batik broke SVG export for both embedded OpeJUMP "Export view" and CadPlan Printer view plugin. I was thinking that 16 jar files and 2.6 Mb (Apache NBatiks) was a large amount if we consider that these libraries are only used for 3 plugins. I foun

Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded

2020-08-09 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
Yes 1.5 ->1.15 Il giorno dom 9 ago 2020 alle ore 14:25 ha scritto: > On 09.08.2020 14:06, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > > I will open a bug ticket for the problem about /loading project files > saved with different versions of OpenJUMP./ It looks quite severe > > just to make sure. you're talking abou

Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded

2020-08-09 Thread edgar . soldin
On 08.08.2020 22:15, Michaud Michael wrote: > Hi Ede, hey Mike and All, hope all is well > I finally found some time and get noticeable differences between last > revision and 1.15. that's good as i lack the experience of what is expected from the corresponding extensions > I just tested expo

Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded

2020-08-09 Thread edgar . soldin
On 09.08.2020 14:06, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > I will open a bug ticket for the problem about /loading project files saved > with different versions of OpenJUMP./ It looks quite severe just to make sure. you're talking about OJ 1.15 (latest release) vs. latest snapshot right? ..ede

Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded

2020-08-09 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
;> - cadplan ISA renderer : get vector and raster with a scale problem on >> 1.15, get nothing with last release >> >> - cadplan core renderer : get vector and raster on 1.15, get nothing with >> last release >> >> => I couldn't get svg map from cadplan

Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded

2020-08-09 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
from cadplan plugin from last release, did you ? > > > Michaël > > > > envoyé : 6 août 2020 à 14:46 > de : edgar.sol...@web.de > à : jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > objet : Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded > > > a quick test of both did not reveal any bu

Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded

2020-08-08 Thread Michaud Michael
Hi Ede,I finally found some time and get noticeable differences between last revision and 1.15.I just tested export image to svg and export map to svg from cadplan (I don't know other places where svg is used).Prepare a map wit a sextante raster and some vectorsExport the view to a file, choose s

Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded

2020-08-06 Thread edgar . soldin
a quick test of both did not reveal any bugs. how about on your sides? ..ede On 05.08.2020 16:14, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > Thanks Ede, > AFAIR also both print plugins have dependencies  to batik classes > Peppe > > Il giorno mer 5 ago 2020 alle ore 15:19 > ha scritto: >

Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded

2020-08-05 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
Thanks Ede, AFAIR also both print plugins have dependencies to batik classes Peppe Il giorno mer 5 ago 2020 alle ore 15:19 ha scritto: > hey All, > > had to touch batik, as it was missing some classes in trunk/lib/batik.jar > after Peppe added AdditionalResultsIO. maven already had the proper b

[JPP-Devel] batik upgraded

2020-08-05 Thread edgar . soldin
hey All, had to touch batik, as it was missing some classes in trunk/lib/batik.jar after Peppe added AdditionalResultsIO. maven already had the proper batik components defined that's why the snapshot builds went fine. while at it i noticed that we were using a quite old batik version and upgrad