[JPP-Devel] image loaders in the worx - status quo

2013-09-02 Thread edgar . soldin
ok, i've got some major (probably OJ1.7 worth) updates coming your way. some bullet points - GeoImageV2 reader - pure java TIFF(tiled)/BIGTIFF/JP2/JPEG/ARC support - native gdal formats support e.g ECW, MrSID (tested and working) but much more - proper disposal of referenced image layers, no m

Re: [JPP-Devel] image loaders in the worx - status quo

2013-09-02 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
Hi Ede, good job. Should we also use native gdal libraries to have gdal support ( http://demo.geo-solutions.it/share/github/imageio-ext/releases/1.1.X/1.1.7/native/gdal/ ). regards Peppe 2013/9/2 > ok, > > i've got some major (probably OJ1.7 worth) updates coming your way. some > bullet points

Re: [JPP-Devel] image loaders in the worx - status quo

2013-09-02 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
Hi, Great news, I am sitting here in front of a few Windows machines with lots of good imagery to test with. I guess I can pass your question about geo-metadata on to folks at Geo-solutions (not sure if they will answer, though) if you can write the exact question that I should ask. -Jukka- e

Re: [JPP-Devel] image loaders in the worx - status quo

2013-09-02 Thread edgar . soldin
well, the exact questions would be: how to retrieve georeference metadata from formats that support it (eg. GeoTIFF, JP2, ECW)? some documentation or implemented examples would help greatly. currently i reuse the Xtiff JAI to only extract the GeoTIFF directory, containing the geotags. This is

Re: [JPP-Devel] image loaders in the worx - status quo

2013-09-02 Thread edgar . soldin
i currently use (successfully 1.11dev) from http://www.gisinternals.com/sdk/ and will try to compile readymade packages for our main platforms windows/linux/osx if this get's released. ..ede On 02.09.2013 13:38, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > Hi Ede, > good job. Should we also use native gdal libra

Re: [JPP-Devel] image loaders in the worx - status quo

2013-09-02 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
Hi The answer is " I'd suggest to look into the geotools wrapper that do the same work https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/plugin/imageio-ext-gdal/src/main/java/org/geotools/coverageio/gdal/BaseGDALGridCoverage2DReader.java this class, and its "neighborhood" should contain th

Re: [JPP-Devel] image loaders in the worx - status quo

2013-09-02 Thread edgar . soldin
ok, will do.. thx alot.. ede On 02.09.2013 14:20, Rahkonen Jukka wrote: > Hi > > The answer is > " I'd suggest to look into the geotools wrapper that do the same work > https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/plugin/imageio-ext-gdal/src/main/java/org/geotools/coverageio/gdal/Base

Re: [JPP-Devel] image loaders in the worx - status quo

2013-09-02 Thread edgar . soldin
afaics.. gdal libs for linux are best retrieved via your distro's software repositories. unfortunately they seem to be stuck with gdal 1.9 (at least debian, ubuntu stable). ..ede On 02.09.2013 14:09, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: > i currently use (successfully 1.11dev) from > http://www.gisinte

Re: [JPP-Devel] image loaders in the worx - status quo

2013-09-02 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
Hi, Other Linux distros lag even more behind with GDAL versions. Ubuntu has a good unstable ubuntugis repository which is safe to use and it comes with GDAL 1.10 https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugis/+archive/ubuntugis-unstable -Jukka Rahkonen- edgar soldin wrote: > > afaics.. gdal libs for linux a

Re: [JPP-Devel] image loaders in the worx - status quo

2013-09-03 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
I compiled gdal 1.9 for Ubuntu 64 bit, not really difficult. I wonder if we can treat gdal libraries as we do for java: not embedded on OJ distro but installed on the OS. This makes OJ distribution smaller as we don't have to install all these dll/so/dylibs. I think that UbutuGIS have a similar str

Re: [JPP-Devel] image loaders in the worx - status quo

2013-09-03 Thread edgar . soldin
hmm.. kind of pointless to compile 1.9, which should be available in Ubuntu repositories. anyway, i expect our users not to be capable to compile anything, so i will probably use a twofold approach that A. will use system wide libraries if installed correctly (for all platforms) or alternativel

Re: [JPP-Devel] image loaders in the worx - status quo

2013-09-03 Thread Stefan Steiniger
yeah please... no compilation tasks for users ;) Even for me, if I hear the words *you need to compile*, then I am thinking: Oh my good.. maybe another time... mhm.. actually, when I am correct, then somebody worked during the Google Summer of code on updating the Debian GIS repository (but not

Re: [JPP-Devel] image loaders in the worx - status quo

2013-09-03 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
I am also against any compilation. I wonder if we can leave OJ as small as possible. Anyhow both Ede's points are fine for me Peppe 2013/9/4 Stefan Steiniger > yeah please... no compilation tasks for users ;) > Even for me, if I hear the words *you need to compile*, then I am > thinking: Oh my

Re: [JPP-Devel] image loaders in the worx - status quo

2013-09-04 Thread edgar . soldin
wrt. to size. current plan (jars are already in snapshots) is CORE contains only imageioext core components & non native formats PLUS additionally contains imageioext native format components the native libs then have to be provided by the users as described before. you can compare sizes of snap