Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: [jump-pilot:bugs] Re: #498 Most GeoTIFF drivers fail with a simple GeoTIFF image

OK. I will do 2020-09-21 18:31 GMT+02:00, edgar.sol...@web.de : > On 21.09.2020 17:19, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: >> Hi Ede, >> it works fine. I was able to cut a selected part of the image. And also I >> tested on some simple  tools form Sextante that generate raster (Rasterize >> a vector layer,

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: [jump-pilot:bugs] Re: #498 Most GeoTIFF drivers fail with a simple GeoTIFF image

On 21.09.2020 17:19, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > Hi Ede, > it works fine. I was able to cut a selected part of the image. And also I > tested on some simple  tools form Sextante that generate raster (Rasterize a > vector layer, change no data value..). > Let us wait for Roberto's test. I think that

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: [jump-pilot:bugs] Re: #498 Most GeoTIFF drivers fail with a simple GeoTIFF image

Hi Ede, it works fine. I was able to cut a selected part of the image. And also I tested on some simple tools form Sextante that generate raster (Rasterize a vector layer, change no data value..). Let us wait for Roberto's test. I think that it is fixed. Also it is nice to reduce time raster

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: [jump-pilot:bugs] Re: #498 Most GeoTIFF drivers fail with a simple GeoTIFF image

the "colors" look a little bit wrong though. different form the original image.. ede On 9/21/2020 16:02, ede wrote: Peppe, please try r6506. extracting a part works for me now. tested on Ubuntu 20. ..ede On 9/21/2020 11:03, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: OK. *First test* a) downloaded 6504 b)

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: [jump-pilot:bugs] Re: #498 Most GeoTIFF drivers fail with a simple GeoTIFF image

thanks, will investigate.. ede On 9/21/2020 13:56, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: On the toolbar. The one that looks like a gray box image.png Il giorno lun 21 set 2020 alle ore 13:47 > ha scritto: On 9/21/2020 11:03, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > h) I drew a fence on

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: [jump-pilot:bugs] Re: #498 Most GeoTIFF drivers fail with a simple GeoTIFF image

On the toolbar. The one that looks like a gray box [image: image.png] Il giorno lun 21 set 2020 alle ore 13:47 ha scritto: > On 9/21/2020 11:03, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > > h) I drew a fence on the raster > > g) On layer tree, selecting Depit070.tif, I clicked on tool "Extract > > selected part

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: [jump-pilot:bugs] Re: #498 Most GeoTIFF drivers fail with a simple GeoTIFF image

On 9/21/2020 11:03, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: h) I drew a fence on the raster g) On layer tree, selecting Depit070.tif, I clicked on tool "Extract selected part of the image" where can i find the tool to draw a fence? ..ede ___ Jump-pilot-devel

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: [jump-pilot:bugs] Re: #498 Most GeoTIFF drivers fail with a simple GeoTIFF image

On 21.09.2020 10:20, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: >>home/giuseppe/Desktop/GIS/OpenJUMP/OpenJUMP-20200915-r6484-PLUS is too old. >>1. please make sure that you use the latest snapshot r6504 > > That is only the folder where I save the OpenJUMP.jar file compiled  from > SVN. I should change the name, your

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: [jump-pilot:bugs] Re: #498 Most GeoTIFF drivers fail with a simple GeoTIFF image

Hi Ede >home/giuseppe/Desktop/GIS/OpenJUMP/OpenJUMP-20200915-r6484-PLUS is too old. >1. please make sure that you use the latest snapshot r6504 That is only the folder where I save the OpenJUMP.jar file compiled from SVN. I should change the name, your right. The OpenJUMP.jar is compiled at 6504

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: [jump-pilot:bugs] Re: #498 Most GeoTIFF drivers fail with a simple GeoTIFF image

/home/giuseppe/Desktop/GIS/OpenJUMP/OpenJUMP-20200915-r6484-PLUS is too old. 1. please make sure that you use the latest snapshot r6504 2. enable debugging as explained earlier '-v debug' 3. disable the RasterImageIO patch beforehand. it should not be needed. repeat your tests and send the

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: [jump-pilot:bugs] Re: #498 Most GeoTIFF drivers fail with a simple GeoTIFF image

Hi Ede, everything fine on my side to load view and zoom raster file. I have problems on loading raster generated by OpenJUMP (ex. using "Extract selected part of the image" tool on Layerable tree - and all Sextante tools to generate raster I tested). I got back this error (see attached log for

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: [jump-pilot:bugs] Re: #498 Most GeoTIFF drivers fail with a simple GeoTIFF image

On 20.09.2020 18:53, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > :-) > Sorry for misunderstanding. nuhhh. no problemo. > Roberto starts the course at the 1 of October.  > He can use OJ 1.15, as well: apart from framework to read raster, there are > no so many changes in raster tool, except the new pixel inspector

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: [jump-pilot:bugs] Re: #498 Most GeoTIFF drivers fail with a simple GeoTIFF image

:-) Sorry for misunderstanding. Roberto starts the course at the 1 of October. He can use OJ 1.15, as well: apart from framework to read raster, there are no so many changes in raster tool, except the new pixel inspector capability. Peppe Il dom 20 set 2020, 18:42 ha scritto: > Peppe, > >

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: [jump-pilot:bugs] Re: #498 Most GeoTIFF drivers fail with a simple GeoTIFF image

Peppe, misunderstanding ;). my question is when do you need it working as stable or better as in OJ 1.15? when do the courses start? ..ede On 20.09.2020 18:19, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > Hi Ede >>what was your time frame again? > TiffUtils ->6398  30/08/2020 > RasterImageLayer  -> 6399  

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: [jump-pilot:bugs] Re: #498 Most GeoTIFF drivers fail with a simple GeoTIFF image

Hi Ede >what was your time frame again? TiffUtils ->6398 30/08/2020 RasterImageLayer -> 6399 31/08/2020 RasterImageIO -->5413 01/04/2017 AddRasterImageLayerWizard --> 5916 18/08/2018 All my modification started from 02/09/2020 Il giorno dom 20 set 2020 alle ore 14:52 ha scritto: >