Re: [j-nsp] BGP Peer Route Table Size OID

2007-03-12 Thread Pekka Savola
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Scott Weeks wrote: > snmpwalk -Os -c passwd -v 1 ipaddress 1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.7 > > jnxExperiment.1.1.2.6.2.1.7.0.1.1 = Gauge32: 210210 > jnxExperiment.1.1.2.6.2.1.7.2.1.1 = Gauge32: 1 > jnxExperiment.1.1.2.6.2.1.7.3.1.1 = Gauge32: 1012 > jnxExperiment.1.1.2.6.2.1.7

Re: [j-nsp] BGP Peer Route Table Size OID

2007-03-12 Thread Scott Weeks
: web and can't find it. What SNMP OID do you guys : use for the number of routes an external BGP peer : is sending you? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:--- .1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.8.X.1.1 and .1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.7.X.1.1 These are BGP peer prefixes in/used (c

Re: [j-nsp] BGP Peer Route Table Size OID

2007-03-12 Thread Eric Van Tol
.1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.8.X.1.1 and .1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.5.1.1.2.6.2.1.7.X.1.1 These are BGP peer prefixes in/used (can't remember which is which), where X is the peer index number. Unfortunately, at least with older JUNOS, the index number number can change with each reset of the BGP sessio

[j-nsp] BGP Peer Route Table Size OID

2007-03-12 Thread Scott Weeks
Hello, I have to ask a noob question as I have been searching everywhere on the web and can't find it. What SNMP OID do you guys use for the number of routes an external BGP peer is sending you? Thanks, scott ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-n

Re: [j-nsp] Cisco / Juniper RSVP-TE

2007-03-12 Thread sthaug
> I need help about RSVP-TE implementation between Cisco Router 7600 and > Juniper M20. > > When the tunnel MPLS-TE is established between these routers and exist more > than one hop the delay increases. > > Somebody know about some case with MPLS-TE between Cisco and Juniper router? Can't h

[j-nsp] Cisco / Juniper RSVP-TE

2007-03-12 Thread Keigo Komatsu
Could anybody help me? Keigo   http://service.bfast.com/bfast/click?bfmid=27638313&siteid=38743497&bfpage=pagina_ppall"; target=_top>http://web1.compaq.com/store/html/affiliates/brz/ipaq_brz_468x60.gif"; width=468>     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Cisco / Juniper RSVP-TEDate:

[j-nsp] Problem with local interface switching

2007-03-12 Thread Angel Bardarov
After little search I found it - its a bug - PR#95358 is related to Channelized T3 PICs. Altough I have 10x CHE1 IQ the behavior is the same. After changing dlci 20 to 200 frame relay switching takes place and ping is OK. Angel Bardarov ___ juniper-ns

Re: [j-nsp] Problem with local interface switching

2007-03-12 Thread Krasimir Avramski
Hi, Do you enable the PE1 interfaces under "protocol mpls" . Krasi ---Original Message-- ---Original Message-- FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TO: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net SU

[j-nsp] Problem with local interface switching

2007-03-12 Thread Angel Bardarov
Hi, I have forwarding problem with frame relay PVCs. I need to do local switching between 2 FR PVCs. The configurations seem to be correct and everything is "up" but no actual traffic is switched. I tried with Junos versions 7.4R2.6 and 8.1R1.5.The topology is: |CE1(edge-a1)|-|PE1(edge-