We have installed SSG 140 for a customer.
I'm also playing with the cisco ASA.
I haven't put neither of them under significant performance test,
however from management point of view, juniper is much easier to
operate and makes much more sense.
If you intend to have complex security configurati
We are starting to see slowdowns on our network (Over 10,000 DSL
Customers). We are using an ERX310 with 2 GE2 modules. I just noticed
that I'm seeing dropped packets in the frabric-queue.
ERX310#show fabric-queue detail
traffic egressforwarded
dropped
class slot
> Leigh,
> can you comment on the IPv6 support on the SSG140 ? If I
> understand correctly, ScreenOS currently only supports
> v6 on certain models?
Reading the 6.0.0r1 release notes, section 1.32 seems to
suggest that IPv6 is only available on the 5000-M2 and SSG
5/20 on Ethernet interfaces;
On 5 Jun 2007, at 17:30, Leigh Porter wrote:
> I have some 140s here and they work well. The older boxes (NS50) have
> been in production for about two years now and have never had any
> issues
> whatsoever.
Leigh,
can you comment on the IPv6 support on the SSG140 ? If I understand
correctly,
Leigh Porter wrote:
> I have some 140s here and they work well. The older boxes (NS50) have
> been in production for about two years now and have never had any issues
> whatsoever.
>
> --
> Leigh
Are you using the IPS functionality of the box?
--Mike
_
I have some 140s here and they work well. The older boxes (NS50) have
been in production for about two years now and have never had any issues
whatsoever.
--
Leigh
Peter E. Fry wrote:
>> Looking for comments from anyone using the Juniper SSG
>> line of security appliances, specifically model
> Looking for comments from anyone using the Juniper SSG
> line of security appliances, specifically model 140 or
> 520. We are considering trying one out as a replacement
> for an aging Cisco PIX 520. Most interested in the
> robustness, IPS functionality, etc. Also note that the
> new 520M
Looking for comments from anyone using the Juniper SSG line of security
appliances, specifically model 140 or 520. We are considering trying one out
as
a replacement for an aging Cisco PIX 520. Most interested in the robustness,
IPS functionality, etc. Also note that the new 520M can run JUN
Barry,
This is standard behavior. Enabling multipath only causes the router to
install multiple next-hops to a destination in the routing table. As the
documentation indicates, the router will choose a single next hop to install
in the forwarding table and it marks this next hop with a carat (>)
All,
I'm currently studying for the JNCIE (taking exam in late August) and
wanted to know if anyone from the London area or surrounding counties
was looking to setup a study group for this. I know of a few companies
that *may* be willing to provide a bootcamp if enough people are
interested. This
Hi Guys,
I'm looking for spec for M10 FEB/ M20 SSB(IPvII) memory.
I could find the info for RE memory type, but not for FEB/SSB.
I'm trying to upgrade it to 256MB.
If you can recommend specific vendor/part number, I would appreciate it.
Thanks.
Hyun
_
I am trying to figure out the significance of the ">" symbol within the
routing table output on the Juniper routers.
According to juniper docs:
"Next hop information Routes may be assigned more than one next-hop
value. Each next hop instructs the router where to forward packets for
each route. Whe
I would like to echo the comments and say an excellent resource to have to hand
when you need to find a quick expalnation of what is needed to complete
configuration tasks.
truly an essential part of the toolbox for any engineer, taking on the day to
day configuration and maintenance of Juniper
Hi Aviva,
Don't be so shy :)
Your cookbook is the best Junos book ever written!
Regards,
Jeff
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aviva Garrett
> Sent: maandag 4 juni 2007 18:13
> To: Jad KAROUT
> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nethe
14 matches
Mail list logo
