Thanks for your replies
I think there was a confusion in my query.
My question was to understand why Route distinguisher is proposed in VPLS
NLRI? What is the use of sending RD in the NLRI?
With MP-BGP, there are two extensions for VPN application.
1 - L3VPN (RFC 4364) and L2 VPN (RFC 4761) both o
Hello,
I need to connect a SSG20 device to an VDSL line with PPPoE over VLAN 7.
I was not able to get this running. Creating a sub-if for VLAN 7 is okay but
I can't bind a PPPoE setting to this virtual device afterwards. Am I missing
something? Is it possible with ScreenOS anyway? I could only fin
Cyclades has many solutions ... really popular in the US
On 6/25/07, Colbourn, Phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We have an OpenGear terminal server installed in our lab. It may suit your
> needs.
>
> http://www.opengear.com.au/
>
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential info
Hi Monika,
You use RD in VPLS if you use BGP (Draft Kompella) for signalling.
If you use LDP (Draft Lasserre-Vkompella) you don't need it.
Regards,
Jeff
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Monika M
> Sent: dinsdag 26 juni 20
Hi Monika,
You can check with RFC 4761. Generally, NLRI for VPLS format is as
following:
++
| Length (2 octets)|
++
| Route Distinguisher (8 octets)|
+-
Hi,
In L3VPN, The purpose of the Route Distinguisher is solely to
allow one to create distinct routes to a common IPv4 address prefix.
But why do we need Route distinguisher for VPLS?
Was this added to VPLS to be consistent with L3VPN?
-Monika
Hello David,
From JUNOS Release 8.2 Features
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos82/rn-sw-82/rn-new-features.html#rn-new-features
in the VPN's section:
Aggregated Ethernet interfaces for VPLS routing instances—You can configure
aggregated Ethernet interfaces between CE devices
7 matches
Mail list logo
