Re: [j-nsp] VPLS tunnel LSP establishment

I suppose that you use RSVP protocol to etablish the LSP. You can use the interface address or the router ID. I advise you to use router ID for a reason of scalability. Regards, Samuel Monika M a écrit : site1---PE1 - P1---P2---(x)-PE2site2 I have BGP peering between

[j-nsp] VPLS tunnel LSP establishment

site1---PE1 - P1---P2---(x)-PE2site2 I have BGP peering between PE1-PE2 for having L2VPN service. L2VPN configuration steps mandate configuration of tunnel LSP establishment. Should I have an LSP for the PE2's interface address x or PE2's router ID. TIA Monika

Re: [j-nsp] Image compatibility

On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:59:11AM -0500, Hyunseog Ryu wrote: Of course, that is key feature of junos. Just remember that already more than 60% of the size of a JUNOS image is all the different subimages for each platform, and it's only going to get worse with new platforms and feature bloat

Re: [j-nsp] Image compatibility

I think IOS for Cisco 7600 router is about that size already. :-) Hyun Leigh Porter wrote: Yeah well it's fudge marketing.. Cisco could do the same if they had 90Mb images too I am sure. Then you'd just have to tral through all the myriad of variations of feature-sets and releases... I