Re: [j-nsp] Opinion about stateful firewall : SSG or ASM

> - Potential savings from using a J4350 router instead of the larger > J6350, as you'll generally be performance-bound by the SSG 550 > firewall. The J4350 lacks redundant power options, though. It's > also not a direct replacement for the SSG 550, whereas the J6350 is, > if that would aff

[j-nsp] Netscreen Virtualization?

Hello, I am curious about the Juniper Netscreen virtualization features. Does anybody have experience in running ISG VSes in highly critical environments? Does it work well? Stable enough to run on critical systems or is one better off running highly critical systems on separate hardware? I

Re: [j-nsp] Opinion about stateful firewall : SSG or ASM

On 2 Sep 2007 at 0:57, Affan Basalamah wrote: [...] > I want to look for Juniper solutions in order to do IP routing, > together with stateful firewall devices. [...] Establishing interface requirements... Sounds like Ethernet only... It's an interesting problem. Adding to what you've already

Re: [j-nsp] P-1GE-SX B rev?

On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 09:32:50AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > What is the difference between a P-1GE-SX and the -B revision of the card? > > Rev B PICs can do l2circuit (Martini tunnel) and a few other things > that the previous revision cannot. Actually there is no difference in the l2c

[j-nsp] NetScreen-5000 future, ISG2000

Hi, Does anyone have any insights into the respective longevity of the NS-5000 and ISG2000 platforms? I'm working on a design at the moment and for throughput reasons, I'm looking at a pair of NS-5400s. It seems though that it's an older platform that may not be as good (in terms of features, sup

Re: [j-nsp] P-1GE-SX B rev?

> What is the difference between a P-1GE-SX and the -B revision of the card? Rev B PICs can do l2circuit (Martini tunnel) and a few other things that the previous revision cannot. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ juniper-nsp maili