Re: [j-nsp] SFP Compatibility

Sometimes when I order juniper part number for SFP from juniper vendor, it is delivered with non-juniper SFP ( from show chassis hardware command view ) even though it is labeled as Juniper part number. :-) Hyun Sent from blackberry - Original Message - From: Evan Williams [EMAIL

Re: [j-nsp] SFP Compatibility

I had no issues using other vendors SFP in a NIT environment and concur that the only symptom of using a non-Juniper SFP was that the platform recognised it was a non--juniper SFP. This was especially useful when we were supplied with only LH and we needed to use SH due to the provision of the

Re: [j-nsp] BFD over ethernet

I don't think BFDoEthernet ever really materialized. The thought was to encapsulate BFD messages in 802.3 frames, with a BFD Ethertype. Phil On Jan 11, 2008, at 4:27 AM, Bit Gossip wrote: I read in a Juniper preso, that BFD can work at layer 2 on a ethernet link, but I can not find any

Re: [j-nsp] juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 62, Issue 19

Hi, Last time I checked it, both Juniper and Cisco has false positive for very aggressive values (in production networks, where there are several other process competing in CPU usage and flap in some links). I am wondering if enabling it on PFE, the possibility of getting recovery timer from 100