Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 subnetting

Hi, Yes, you cannot assign 10::14/126 which 4 I believe is network ID for /126 (/30 in ipv4), before 10::14/126 there should 10::/126. If you still want you this /126, please set to 10::15/126 should be fine. rgs a. rahman isnaini rangkayo sutan. snort bsd wrote: > Hi all: > >>From RFC4291,

Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 subnetting

Sorry error message was with address 2:10::14/126. I also tried so-called "site-local address", now deprecated, and had similar errors. - Original Message From: snort bsd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: juniper-nsp Sent: Thursday, 31 January, 2008 11:21:07 PM Subject: [j-nsp] IPv6 subnetting

[j-nsp] IPv6 subnetting

Hi all: >From RFC4291, the IPv6 addressing scheme is more like nowadays IPv4 VLSM. But >IPv6 doesn't have "broadcasting addresses". Then how does that affect IPv6 >addressing? Say, fec0:10:10:10::/64, intuitively we know that we can't use the first address, does that mean we can use rest of ad

Re: [j-nsp] ethernet aggregation between M5 and HP Procurve 4000M

I've done successfully the trunking on 2 fastethernet M5 ports aggregated with outgoing traffic 95% load balanced, the switch is catalyst 2924XL. Thanks to Ariff. rgs a. rahman isnaini rangkayo sutan Tim Durack wrote: > On Jan 31, 2008 9:59 AM, Nicolaj Kamensek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> A

Re: [j-nsp] ethernet aggregation between M5 and HP Procurve 4000M

On Jan 31, 2008 9:59 AM, Nicolaj Kamensek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Antonio Querubin schrieb: > > Hi, > > > Anybody know if Junipers are able to do ethernet aggregation with an HP > > Procurve 4000M switch? The Procurve 4000M config menu provides 3 > > different aggregation types: Trunk, FEC,

Re: [j-nsp] The Switch is ON !!!

On (2008-01-31 11:36 -0200), Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote: > A good price reference would be the Cisco ME6524, which has a US$12k > street price. What are the current street price estimates on Juniper > EX3200-24T with a 4 GbE uplink module ? I have disagree, there isn't comparable cisco product. This

Re: [j-nsp] ethernet aggregation between M5 and HP Procurve 4000M

Antonio Querubin schrieb: Hi, > Anybody know if Junipers are able to do ethernet aggregation with an HP > Procurve 4000M switch? The Procurve 4000M config menu provides 3 > different aggregation types: Trunk, FEC, and SA-Trunk. Would any of > these work with an M5 running JunOS 7? guess "t

[j-nsp] ethernet aggregation between M5 and HP Procurve 4000M

Anybody know if Junipers are able to do ethernet aggregation with an HP Procurve 4000M switch? The Procurve 4000M config menu provides 3 different aggregation types: Trunk, FEC, and SA-Trunk. Would any of these work with an M5 running JunOS 7? Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN _

Re: [j-nsp] The Switch is ON !!!

> Again - Juniper's main focus for this switch is the enterprise. They're > trying to get some of that sweet, sweet Cisco territory that they've > been so hungry for since purchasing Netscreen. Depending on the > popularity of these switches, I wouldn't be surprised if they made a > more formal e