Re: [j-nsp] M7i to Extreme BD6808

2008-02-13 Thread Dusan Avbreht
Check ethertype on BD and Juniper!!! - default value is usually different !!! Dusan On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 1:17 AM, John T. Yocum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Got a strange problem. I'm trying to setup an aggregated ethernet > connection between a PE-4FE-TX and an Extreme BD6808 with

Re: [j-nsp] P-1GE-SFP in standard FPC?

2008-02-13 Thread Pekka Savola
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Nicolaj Kamensek wrote: > does a P(E)-1GE-SFP PIC require a FPC-E or does this PIC also work in > the standard FPC? Yes, at least FPC-E is required. At some point I believe this was included in the documentation [1], but after the PIC/FPC support pages were redone, this info

Re: [j-nsp] P-1GE-SFP in standard FPC?

2008-02-13 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Nicolaj Kamensek wrote: > Hi list, Hello. > does a P(E)-1GE-SFP PIC require a FPC-E or does this PIC > also work in the standard FPC? The PE-1GE-SFP appears to be supported on the M7i and M10i, while the P-1GE-SFP on the M20. Which platform are you referring to?

Re: [j-nsp] P-1GE-SFP in standard FPC?

2008-02-13 Thread Jonas Frey
Hi Nico, this requires a FPC-E. The pic will be detected inside a normal FPC but you will not be able to pass any traffic thus its useless in a normal FPC. Regards, Jonas On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 01:17, Nicolaj Kamensek wrote: > Hi list, > > does a P(E)-1GE-SFP PIC require a FPC-E or does this PI

[j-nsp] P-1GE-SFP in standard FPC?

2008-02-13 Thread Nicolaj Kamensek
Hi list, does a P(E)-1GE-SFP PIC require a FPC-E or does this PIC also work in the standard FPC? Thanks, Nicolaj -- Accelerated IT Services GmbH Schubertstrasse 10D-67251 Freinsheim [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.accelerated.de/ Telefon: +49 69-257

Re: [j-nsp] M7i to Extreme BD6808

2008-02-13 Thread Frances Albemuth
This may not be the case in your scenario, but I once found that I had the appearance of the physical layer being down between an M7i and a switch after having configured vlan-tagging on an aggregated Ethernet link. This strangely persisted until I had mapped a VLAN on both ends (i.e., configured

[j-nsp] Junose (ERX) IP pool management

2008-02-13 Thread Gabriel Blanchard
We are trying to configure multiple ERXs 310 to share a Pool of IPs to assign to DSL customers. These ERXs are acting as LNSes. The problem is that right now we are statically configuring each of the ERXs with different Pools of IPs. We would like all of them to be able to share the same Poo

[j-nsp] end of development of e320

2008-02-13 Thread Jeff Tantsura
Hi, I have heard some rumors about end of development of e320. Can somebody confirm/deny these? Thanks I advance, Jeff ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] NetScreen-Remote and RSA

2008-02-13 Thread Sven Juergensen (KielNET)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, did anyone ever try to make the NetScreen-Remote VPN-client work against an RSA Server? Can the pin creation and authentication be proxied to the user like the cisco vpn client can? Thanks and regards, sven03 Mit freundlichen Gruessen i.