[j-nsp] AAA

Hello i have a E320 and i use radius as authentication. i have one VR and 4 VRFs the thing i want to do is when radius becomes unavailable the users to log to the bras without authentication but i am confused to which VR this is supposed to be configured. any ideas __

[j-nsp] Juniper output flow sampling and MPLS packets

Hello, Before filing a JTAC case I'd like to ask help from this list as I couldn't find any information from the web. I have simple topology: +-+ | | backbone + mx960 + peering | | \ +++ \ in/out sa

Re: [j-nsp] Service Set Help !!

Dear Doug, i will definetly go for this book no doubt, but can you tell me some other resource also like where did you took help to understand these concepts ? any other book do you prefer ? Doug Marschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Try this link to preorder: http://www.juniper.net/training/j

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS issue

f you using RSVP for MPLS LSP. To prevent this type of packet loss in MPLS LSPs, you can configure MTU signaling in RSVP. This feature is described in RFC 3209. Juniper Networks supports the Integrated Services object for MTU signaling in RSVP. The Integrated Services object is described in RFCs 22

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS issue

On Tuesday 04 March 2008, David Ball wrote: > We do the same here. 1600 on cust ports, 9k on core > network ports. Shouldn't have to revisit them too often. Indeed. We are at 9,000 bytes across our backbone. Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [j-nsp] Service Set Help !!

Try this link to preorder: http://www.juniper.net/training/jnbooks/enterpriserouting.html Doug Marschke Principal Technologist Strategic Networks Training JNCIE-ER #3, JNCIE-M/T #41, JNCIS-FW, JNAT www.ietraining.net (415)902-5702 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EM

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS issue

We do the same here. 1600 on cust ports, 9k on core network ports. Shouldn't have to revisit them too often. David On 03/03/2008, Erdem Sener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FWIW, I'd configure all ethernets with MTU 1600 as a policy and never > think about MTU again. > (including any switches i

Re: [j-nsp] j-series vs. short pings ?

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 09:31:42AM -0800, Paul Goyette wrote: > > > If your traffic is transiting an IPsec tunnel, please have > > > a look at the following tech bulletin: > > > > IPSec is not involved in this setup, lab topology is as simple as > > notebook(freebsd) - switch(catalyst 2960) - juni

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS issue

FWIW, I'd configure all ethernets with MTU 1600 as a policy and never think about MTU again. (including any switches in the middle as said) Erdem On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Mark Tinka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 03 March 2008, Ying Zhang wrote: > > > we are having a wired MPLS pr

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS issue

On Monday 03 March 2008, Ying Zhang wrote: > we are having a wired MPLS problem. Here is how the > network looks like: > > end users M7i M120 ISP > > The mpls lsp is between M7i and M120. The problem is the > end users have problems accessing certain websites, very > slow or not acce

[j-nsp] MPLS issue

Hello, we are having a wired MPLS problem. Here is how the network looks like: end users M7i M120 ISP The mpls lsp is between M7i and M120. The problem is the end users have problems accessing certain websites, very slow or not accessible, some websites no problem at all. With MP

Re: [j-nsp] vrrp question

Hi Erol, Please check out for Ethernet OAM standards IEEE 802.1ah and ag on this. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos85/swconfig85-networ k-interfaces/id-12172423.html#id-12172423 Thanks Ashok -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beha

[j-nsp] vrrp question

hi, i have two m7i boxes. I use vrrp for redundancy and track the OUT interface with the following configuration. Router1> show configuration interfaces ge-0/0/0 unit 0 { family inet { filter { output FILTER2; } address 193.140.71.4/24 { vrrp-gr