We currently have two J4350s running as border routers for our hosting
network (multihomed to various ISPs and IXs).
Because of the inevitable asymmetry in the traffic going through our
border routers, we can't run stateful firewall filters on our border
routers. For this reason I am looking to p
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:34:25 -0700, Jonathan Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Nope, only virtual* present is the virtual-chassis config.
oh dear, i made a mistake ;). You are right.
I had a look to an ERX instead of an EX.
My fault.
Best regards,
Olaf
_
I sat through the EX presentation given by our account team a month
or 2 ago. To me, they look to have tremendous potential. However,
the lack of features currently supported for an SP environment are
what's keeping it out of our network for now (never mind MPLS...they
can't even do QinQ yet).
Juniper confirmed routing-instances is not supported today on the EX.
It will be supported with or without MPLS with the same software
release that will support MPLS.
I'm still curious about how other SPs feel with the positioning and
future of the EX regarding Metro Ethernet networks...
Rubens
sorry all it is a SSG20
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Ivan c <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone setup a IPSec tunnel between a Cisco VPN Concentrator and a SSG50?
>
> Any gotchas or other issues?
>
> I have seen this, but its between IOS and a Netscreen, just wondering
> if the
Nope, only virtual* present is the virtual-chassis config.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] edit virt?
Possible completions:
> virtual-chassis Virtual chassis configuration
Under this version of JUNOS virtual routers live under routing-instances as
instance-type virtual-router.
-Jonathan
-Original
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:38:08 -0700, Jonathan Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> It has this nice error in the config block when you add it...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> show configuration routing-instances
what about virtual-routers?
IIRC the ERX considers Layer1-Layer2 to the "context" default
Rubens,
It has this nice error in the config block when you add it...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> show configuration routing-instances
##
## Warning: configuration block ignored: unsupported platform (ex4200-24t)
##
So I'd say that is a no... might just be a currently unsupported thing though.
-Jonathan
I'm considering Juniper EX series for a new Metro Ethernet project,
but the specs on the site haven't answered some doubts.
- Does the EX has some "VRF-Lite" capability, i.e., multiple routing
tables, attachment of interfaces and protocol instances to different
contexts ? No MPLS involved, just pl
When you do address shifting, the Netscreen will consistently
translate the original source IP to a particular address from the DIP
pool. So in your case, shifting from 10.1.1.5 to 1.1.10.2 1.1.10.20
will give you the following mappings:
10.1.1.5--1.1.10.2
10.1.1.6--
hi,
Is it possible to include L2Tp client IP address in
radius accouting packets? we use Juniper E320 as LAC
which authenticate VPDN customer with radius server.
we found there is NO L2TP client IP in radius
accouting packets. Is is possible to include that
information as that of dial-up
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (cscosunny) [Tue 15 Apr 2008, 15:29 CEST]:
>I have a routing question
>
>I have a firewall 5gt Ethernet1 is 192.168.30.1/16 and mail server is
>192.168.0.240/16
>
>5gt pings mail server and vice versa in my pc I have 192.168.30.10/16
>and I have connectivity to the mail server
One of our m10i's generated the following syslog message. Slot 0, Pic slot
3 is Adaptive Services II pic. We opened a case with JTAC but haven't had a
response yet. Any details would be appreciated.
Apr 3 11:13:15 xxx.runet.rutgers.net Slot 0, PIC
Slot 3) FUZZ: %PFE-4: L1$ single bit
Hello
I have a routing question
I have a firewall 5gt Ethernet1 is 192.168.30.1/16 and mail server is
192.168.0.240/16
5gt pings mail server and vice versa in my pc I have 192.168.30.10/16 and I
have connectivity to the mail server but when mask is /24 in my pc I cannot
ping mail server.
I un
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:48:05PM +0800, Plz wrote:
> Alex, is there any reference about these autocreated interfaces, including
> the lo0.16385 as Alain mentioned ?
> i googled but got nth.
I found this note in:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos73/swcmdref73-interfaces/downlo
Hello
If the set int eth3 dip 5 shift-from 10.1.1.5 1.1.10.2 1.1.10.20
How is the address assignment handled? for lets say 10.1.1.7 what ip address
will he have?
Thanks
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.
I have found this in the Juniper documentation. It seems interesting:
https://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/erx/junose90/swconfig-bgp-mpls/html/mpls-config13.html#2124222
Regards,
Samuel
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] de la part de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: mar. 15/04
> I enabled LDP on loopback (but only on the M10i side) but the result is the
> same. Dont you think that running LDP on loopback is required for
> establishing directed/targeted LDP session?
You have to activate LDP on loopback if you want use Enhanced LDP, what is
useful if you configure Ma
Iftikhar and Oliver,
Many thanks for your inputs. I enabled LDP on loopback (but only on
the M10i side) but the result is the same. Dont you think that running
LDP on loopback is required for establishing directed/targeted LDP
session? Is there something I am missing on the ERX side?
Regards,
Ju
Woking configuration:
protocols {
mpls {
interface ge-0/1/0.2;
}
ldp {
interface ge-0/1/0.2;
interface lo0.0;
}
You need the lo0 interface to establish the ldp session (Hello packages).
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I think you read this a bit differently than I. I think the issue was
>> how few components are required to power up and boot an RE in an M320.
>>
>
> I think the person who asked the question in the first place needs to
> clarify it.
>
>
>> I don't know the ans
A little help required people :(
Regards,
Junaid
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Junaid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to enable MPLS between ERX1440 and M10i routers. The
> routers are connected via an Ethernet switch. I have three Cisco
> routers on the same subnet a
22 matches
Mail list logo
